Search for: "State v. Poland"
Results 221 - 240
of 704
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Apr 2020, 6:00 am
COVID-19:Blog posts & press:"Coronavirus Lockdown Pushes Refugees in Russia to the Brink," Reuters, 24 April 2020 [text]COVID-19, Asylum in the EU, and the Great Expectations of Solidarity (Kaldor Centre, April 2020) [text]The COVID-19 Pandemic Suggests the Lessons Learned by European Asylum Policymakers after the 2015 Migration Crisis are Fading (MPI Commentary, April 2020) [text]Seeking a Path to Europe, Refugees and Migrants Ultimately Turned Back by Covid-19 (CSIS Commentary, April… [read post]
16 Apr 2020, 5:42 am
Russia § 97, X v. [read post]
15 Apr 2020, 4:12 pm
A couple of decades later, in Jacobson v. [read post]
5 Apr 2020, 2:35 pm
Valeska V. [read post]
5 Apr 2020, 3:07 am
Poland (Application no. 30813/14), Vladimir Ushakov v. [read post]
18 Mar 2020, 2:37 pm
Good to Know · Restrictions: Restrictions have been adopted at provincial level to prevent the spread of the COVID-19 with a state of emergency declared in Ontario. [read post]
1 Mar 2020, 9:01 pm
”The lament for Poland should be a warning for the United States. [read post]
12 Feb 2020, 12:54 pm
The Supreme Administrative Court stated that in accordance with the law on civil status register, the transcription must be refused if contrary to ordre public in Poland. [read post]
31 Jan 2020, 8:37 am
The GC further stated that trademarks in the field of pet care products and food (classes 5 and 31) would normally be perceived visually, as the products are purchased from shelves. [read post]
Defamation Act 2013: A summary and overview six years on, Part 1, Sections 1 to 3 – Brett Wilson LLP
28 Jan 2020, 4:39 pm
In Euroeco Fuels (Poland) Ltd & Ors v Szczecin And Swinoujscie Seaports Authority SA & Ors [2018] EWHC 1081 (QB) Nicol J noted that Parliament had not intended to limit ‘serious financial loss’ to special damage, and that was no reason why financial loss, like other forms of serious harm, was not capable of being inferred from evidence. [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 7:27 am
Chapter 7 analyzes Itar-Tass Russian News Agency v. [read post]
1 Jan 2020, 4:24 pm
A CJEU challenge to Article 17 by the Polish government (Poland v Parliament and Council, Case C-401/19) is pending. [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 4:40 am
In Rimini Street, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Dec 2019, 6:55 am
Under FIL Article 20, “The state expropriates (征收) no foreign investment”. [read post]
30 Dec 2019, 6:55 am
Under FIL Article 20, “The state expropriates (征收) no foreign investment”. [read post]
15 Dec 2019, 2:15 pm
This includes the so-called snippet tax (the press publishers’ right) and the Article 17 rules for online sharing service providers (OSSPs).A CJEU challenge to Article 17 by the Polish government (Poland v Parliament and Council, Case C-401/19) is pending. [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 4:19 pm
Poland Poland’s ruling party has sued a law professor for tweets claiming the organisation was a “organized criminal group”, the New York Times reports. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 10:43 am
Session 2: Legal Protection for DesignIntroduction: Chris Sprigman: what kinds of protection should be available depends on what the justifications for protection are. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 1:38 pm
” (SABAM v. [read post]
28 Nov 2019, 10:39 am
| Feilin v. [read post]
