Search for: "State v. Poland"
Results 261 - 280
of 705
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 May 2019, 7:37 am
Rafaelʹ Lemkin : radi︠a︡nsʹkyĭ henot︠s︡yd v Ukraïni : statti︠a︡ 28 movamy. [read post]
16 May 2019, 6:30 am
Levinson and Balkin mention Shelby County v. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 2:50 am
Other circumstances were expressly deemed to be “not decisive”, especially the stays of mother and child in Poland in the context of leave periods or holidays, the mother’s cultural ties to Poland and her intention of settling in Poland in the future. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 2:23 pm
(quoting Mozes v. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 6:04 am
For example the Appellate Division has held that the fact that a decedent registered to vote in a particular state does not mean that the decedent made that state his or her domicile (see Laufer v Hauge, 140 AD2d 671 [2d Dept 1988]; Matter of Estate of Gadway, 133 AD2d 83 [3d Dept 1987]). [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 5:00 am
Note, moreover, that language deficiencies tend to affect some receiving states much more than others. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 6:19 pm
Board members were selected to represent EU Member States, EC DGs and agencies, NSC, and industry (notably through BIAC). [read post]
13 Feb 2019, 11:12 pm
‘The Supreme Court decision in eBay v. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 9:09 pm
Companies that, according to officials in Poland, bought the meat in Sweden are Stockholm World AB, Dinc Invest, Globe Food, and Vänern Försäljning AB. [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 8:33 pm
A company can, of course, consider permitting sales via-online platforms in Germany (and perhaps Poland and United Kingdom, where the use of online platforms is also high) and prohibiting the sales in other countries. [read post]
12 Jan 2019, 4:52 am
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit’s ruling in Davidson v. [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 8:16 am
Plachta reported on the ECtHR decision in Krombach/Bamerski and the ECtHR Grand Chamber’s decision (Nait-Liman v. [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 8:16 am
Plachta reported on the ECtHR decision in Krombach/Bamerski and the ECtHR Grand Chamber’s decision (Nait-Liman v. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 9:19 am
| The IP term (thus far) of the millennium: the curious story of the adoption of "patent troll" and "internet trolling" | No pain, no gain: Plausibility in Warner-Lambert v Actavis | Testing the boundaries of subjectivity: Infringement of Swiss-type claims in Warner-Lambert v Actavis | Is SPINNING generic? [read post]
27 Dec 2018, 12:56 am
Case date: 11 February 2016 Case number: V CSK 331/15 Court: Supreme Court of Poland A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
28 Nov 2018, 6:14 pm
Of the 105 BITs, 12 were concluded (and are still in force) with states which have eventually become EU Member States (Bulgaria, Croatia, the Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Malta, Poland, Romania, Slovakia, and Slovenia). [read post]
8 Nov 2018, 6:15 am
See also related discussion list posting.UNHCR Reiterates the Importance of Eradication of Statelessness in Ukraine (UNHCR, Nov. 2018) [text via ReliefWeb]UNHCR Welcomes Spain and Haiti Move to Counter Statelessness (UNHCR, Sept. 2018) [text]- Both countries recently took action to accede to one or both of the statelessness conventions.Blog posts:Chasing Shadows: Making Statelessness Visible in Poland (ENS Blog, Sept. 2018) [text]Court of Appeal Says Statelessness Must be Proved on… [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 4:23 pm
In Savva Terentyev v. [read post]
16 Sep 2018, 4:21 pm
Weapon Turns Against the Master: Poland and the Rule of Law As the incumbent Polish prime minster explained to Deutsche Welle, “good of nation is above the law and so the law is not sacred”. [read post]
15 Sep 2018, 5:26 am
Miller and Emami v. [read post]
