Search for: "State v. Poland" Results 281 - 300 of 703
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Apr 2009, 9:46 pm
Yesterday, on 28 April 2009, the ECJ delivered its judgment in case C-420/07 (Meletis Apostolides v. [read post]
20 Feb 2016, 12:30 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
 Germany, Spain, France, UK, Poland, Sweden; 2014. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 5:01 am by Jeremy K. Davis
Although some scholars may disagree, Hague V and Hague XIII generally reflect CIL binding on all states. [read post]
16 May 2011, 1:10 am by Marie Louise
Mountain States (Patently-O) Court of Appeal of Michigan – Malpractice: Failure to thoroughly advise in settlement negotiations: Viking Corp. v. [read post]
1 Jan 2020, 4:24 pm by INFORRM
A CJEU challenge to Article 17 by the Polish government (Poland v Parliament and Council, Case C-401/19) is pending. [read post]
28 Feb 2022, 10:17 am by Katherine Pompilio
Mishustin and Foreign Minister Sergey V. [read post]
28 Nov 2018, 6:14 pm by Simon Lester
Of the 105 BITs, 12 were concluded (and are still in force) with states which have eventually become EU Member States (Bulgaria, Croatia, the Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Malta, Poland, Romania, Slovakia, and Slovenia). [read post]
31 Jul 2007, 12:35 am
Givhan stated that "[s]howing cleavage is a request to be engaged in a particular way," adding that "[t]o display cleavage in a setting that does not involve cocktails and hors d'oeuvres is a provocation. [read post]
7 Feb 2021, 4:53 pm by INFORRM
United States Bloomberg had a piece “Fox News Faces $2.7 Billion Lawsuit Over Voting Machine Fraud Claims”. [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 2:07 am by Kluwer Patent blogger
Less than four months before the launch of the new system, Kluwer IP Law interviewed Véron and asked him how it all started. [read post]
9 Feb 2022, 12:02 pm by Katherine Pompilio
Adam Chan discussed how the decision in Torres v. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 3:28 pm by NL
Sporrong [Sporrong and Lönnroth v Sweden (1983) 5 EHRR 35] itself) that the presence or absence of compensation is not a separate issue, but is an important element in deciding whether, in authorising the interference in the general interest, the balance struck by the state is fair. [read post]