Search for: "State v. Poland" Results 361 - 380 of 703
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Oct 2011, 1:19 pm by 1 Crown Office Row
Despite this acknowledgement, the Panel concludes that courts have become more open to human rights arguments following cases like Targosinski v Poland, which overturned established authority that a district judge cannot refuse to hear evidence at first instance and must conduct a proper enquiry into any Human Rights arguments. [read post]
23 May 2017, 12:40 pm by Jordan Brunner, Chris Mirasola
” In the end, and by distinguishing from US v. [read post]
18 May 2015, 10:42 am by Cody Poplin
Poland is set to release $250,000 USD to two Guantanamo Bay captives allegedly tortured by the CIA in a secret facility in the country, reports the Miami Herald. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 11:21 am by Quinta Jurecic , Staley Smith
Paul posted about how the Supreme Court’s recent decision in City of Los Angeles v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 2:36 am by Kelly
‘Complan’ ad-campaign – ‘ad-gurus’ gone wild (Spicy IP) Israel Ruling real legal expenses rather than rough estimate (IP Factor) Israel Ministry of Justice to refund patent filing publication fees to applicants (IP Factor) Kabbalah Diet trademark cancelled due to lack of use (IP Factor) Italy Italian Food Police cracks down on foreign GI counterfeits (Class 46) Poland XAVIER LAURENT – the story continues (Class 46) Poland: most valuable brands… [read post]
24 May 2010, 10:49 pm
Otter Ultra Low Drag (EPLAW)   Poland Poland: protect your trade marks and brands or... [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 10:00 pm by Rosalind English
Section 3 of the Representation of the People Act 1983 remains unamended by the rulings in  Hirst v United Kingdom (No 2) (2006) 42 EHRR 849 and Greens and MT v United Kingdom (23 November 2010) that it offends against Article 3 Protocol 1 by imposing a blanket ban on prisoners from participating in elections. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 5:46 am
Sidemans and Company Nigeria Limited v Calag Capital Limited (Afro-IP)   Poland Personal circumstances in trade mark registration (Class 46)   South Africa FIFA v Metcash trade mark case – Owen Dean’s response (Afro-IP) South Africa 1 – Ambush Marketers 0: legal framework to help FIFA and 2010 World Cup sponsors protect their rights (Managing IP)   Switzerland New developments in Swiss patent law (IP Frontline)… [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 4:46 am
Sidemans and Company Nigeria Limited v Calag Capital Limited (Afro-IP) Poland Personal circumstances in trade mark registration (Class 46) South Africa FIFA v Metcash trade mark case - Owen Dean's response (Afro-IP) South Africa 1 - Ambush Marketers 0: legal framework to help FIFA and 2010 World Cup sponsors protect their rights (Managing IP) Switzerland New developments in Swiss patent law (IP Frontline) Federal Administrative Court finds PARK AVENUE not descriptive… [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 4:46 am
Sidemans and Company Nigeria Limited v Calag Capital Limited (Afro-IP) Poland Personal circumstances in trade mark registration (Class 46) South Africa FIFA v Metcash trade mark case - Owen Dean's response (Afro-IP) South Africa 1 - Ambush Marketers 0: legal framework to help FIFA and 2010 World Cup sponsors protect their rights (Managing IP) Switzerland New developments in Swiss patent law (IP Frontline) Federal Administrative Court finds PARK AVENUE not descriptive… [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 9:42 am by Frank Cranmer
Lack of legal recognition for same-sex relationships again In Przybyszewska and Others v Poland [2023] ECHR 999, the applicants were five same-sex couples who complained of a lack of any form of legal recognition and protection for their respective relationships [1]. [read post]
3 Jan 2021, 4:01 pm by INFORRM
The Polish government’s challenge to Article 17 (Poland v Parliament and Council, Case C-401/19) is pending. [read post]