Search for: "State v. Poland"
Results 21 - 40
of 694
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 May 2023, 9:01 pm
Products were intended for further treatment ahead of sale at JIP východočeská stores. [read post]
9 May 2023, 8:13 am
Written by Zuzanna Nowicka, lawyer at the Helsinki Foundation for Human Rights and lecturer at Department of Logic and Legal Argumentation at University of Warsaw In the aftermath of the judgment of the ICJ of 2012 in the case of the Jurisdictional Immunities of the State (Germany v. [read post]
7 May 2023, 12:30 am
Betül Durmuş, Strasbourg Observers: Cupiał v Poland: what could this case offer on religious upbringing? [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 6:30 am
Existing democracies are fragile.[3] That includes the United States. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 1:01 am
Howell v. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 3:47 pm
Audit system could be a solution, involvement of member states could be a solution, but we have to discuss the issues openly. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 1:18 pm
CJEU Poland: one limit the court focused on is that rightsholders have to provide relevant and necessary information. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 7:48 am
Is that governed by Member State law? [read post]
4 Apr 2023, 4:19 pm
A summary of the facts The case of Macatė v. [read post]
2 Apr 2023, 11:52 pm
For an institution that likes to lecture the whole world--at times even the United States--about democracy and the rule of law, it's remarkable what the Commission's draft SEP regulation envisages. [read post]
2 Apr 2023, 11:08 am
Challenges and Opportunities for Mediation in Investor-State Dispute Settlement Romesh Weeramantry, Brian Chang, & Joel Sherard-Chow, Conciliation and Mediation in Investor-State Dispute Settlement Provisions: A Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 3:05 am
Z.o.o. and Ors v Jakubowski and Ors. [read post]
18 Mar 2023, 2:09 am
V. (2004). [read post]
11 Mar 2023, 4:38 am
It is open to question whether compliance with the legality principle can be achieved simply by inserting ‘proportionate’ into a broadly stated legal duty, instead of grasping the nettle of articulating a more concrete obligation that would enable the proportionality of the interference with fundamental rights to be assessed by a court. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 5:16 am
(For more on this, see Chambers v. [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 10:43 am
(V. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 12:34 pm
Republic of Germany v. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 5:50 pm
Examples include Marbury v. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 4:31 am
This is according to a statement made by the press service of Yevgeny V. [read post]
12 Feb 2023, 9:30 pm
Examples include Marbury v. [read post]
