Search for: "State v. Poland"
Results 381 - 400
of 714
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Oct 2009, 4:46 am
Sidemans and Company Nigeria Limited v Calag Capital Limited (Afro-IP) Poland Personal circumstances in trade mark registration (Class 46) South Africa FIFA v Metcash trade mark case - Owen Dean's response (Afro-IP) South Africa 1 - Ambush Marketers 0: legal framework to help FIFA and 2010 World Cup sponsors protect their rights (Managing IP) Switzerland New developments in Swiss patent law (IP Frontline) Federal Administrative Court finds PARK AVENUE not descriptive… [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 4:46 am
Sidemans and Company Nigeria Limited v Calag Capital Limited (Afro-IP) Poland Personal circumstances in trade mark registration (Class 46) South Africa FIFA v Metcash trade mark case - Owen Dean's response (Afro-IP) South Africa 1 - Ambush Marketers 0: legal framework to help FIFA and 2010 World Cup sponsors protect their rights (Managing IP) Switzerland New developments in Swiss patent law (IP Frontline) Federal Administrative Court finds PARK AVENUE not descriptive… [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 10:00 pm
Section 3 of the Representation of the People Act 1983 remains unamended by the rulings in Hirst v United Kingdom (No 2) (2006) 42 EHRR 849 and Greens and MT v United Kingdom (23 November 2010) that it offends against Article 3 Protocol 1 by imposing a blanket ban on prisoners from participating in elections. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 9:42 am
Lack of legal recognition for same-sex relationships again In Przybyszewska and Others v Poland [2023] ECHR 999, the applicants were five same-sex couples who complained of a lack of any form of legal recognition and protection for their respective relationships [1]. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 5:50 pm
Examples include Marbury v. [read post]
3 Jan 2021, 4:01 pm
The Polish government’s challenge to Article 17 (Poland v Parliament and Council, Case C-401/19) is pending. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 1:18 pm
CJEU Poland: one limit the court focused on is that rightsholders have to provide relevant and necessary information. [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 4:43 pm
On 4 August 2023, the Court of Appeal handed down judgment in National Council for Civil Liberties, R (On the Application Of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Anor [2023] EWCA Civ 926. [read post]
2 Mar 2022, 1:01 pm
Eleventh emergency special session Agenda item 5 Letter dated 28 February 2014 from the Permanent Representative of Ukraine to the United Nations addressed to the President of the Security Council (S/2014/136) A/ES-11/L.1 Distr.: Limited 1 March 2022 Original: English 22-02912 (E) Afghanistan, Albania, Andorra, Antigua and Barbuda, Argentina, Australia,… [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 4:56 am
Applera Corp (Patently-O) (271 Patent Blog) District Court S D Indiana: Stay pending reexam lifted prior to issuance of reexam certificate (Docket Report) District Court N D Illinois: United States is not an indispensible party to false marking action: ZOJO Solutions Inc. v. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 12:35 am
Poland Index On Censorship examines the worrying implications of defamation through the criminal code in Poland. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 6:30 am
Existing democracies are fragile.[3] That includes the United States. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 12:12 pm
Ofcom states that if competition concerns are identified, it could lead to further action. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
(Spicy IP) Global credit crisis leads to boom times for legal process outsourcing businesses specialising in IP (Spicy IP) Israel Israeli bakery Matzot Aviv files trade mark infringement suit against rival Patisserie Aviv and US importer Bagel Bites (The IP Factor) Israel Patent Office relaxes conditions for modified examination (The IP Factor) Italy Italian Supreme Court recognises ‘post sale confusion’ in criminal proceedings concerning sales of… [read post]
8 May 2009, 10:00 am
: Warner Bros v V G Santosh (Spicy IP) Where do we go? [read post]
24 Dec 2008, 2:00 pm
(Class 46) Trading Standards officers uses new inspection powers granted under Copyright, Designs and Patent Act (Out-Law) United States US General IP legislation to watch in 2009 (Law360) IP cases to follow in 2009 (Law360) US Trade Representative issues statement on Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ContentAgenda) Does the Federal Circuit need a fresh viewpoint? [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 5:00 am
(Halkbank) v. [read post]
2 May 2010, 1:12 pm
United States v. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 2:55 am
: Hewlett-Packard Co. v Acceleron, LLC (Florida Patent Lawyer Blog) (PatLit) District Court E D Texas: Device component may ‘receive’ data from itself: Datatreasury Corporation v. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 2:55 am
: Hewlett-Packard Co. v Acceleron, LLC (Florida Patent Lawyer Blog) (PatLit) District Court E D Texas: Device component may ‘receive’ data from itself: Datatreasury Corporation v. [read post]
