Search for: "State v. Poland"
Results 401 - 420
of 617
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Aug 2011, 3:28 pm
Sporrong [Sporrong and Lönnroth v Sweden (1983) 5 EHRR 35] itself) that the presence or absence of compensation is not a separate issue, but is an important element in deciding whether, in authorising the interference in the general interest, the balance struck by the state is fair. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 4:00 am
The Case of the Day is Agudas Chasidei Chabad of the United States v. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 2:43 am
Bugajny v Poland para 56ff) have given further guidance on the practical application of A1P1. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 5:48 am
Baczewski International (USA) Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 5:30 am
Jakobski v Poland (December 2010) – read judgment Mahayana Buddhists have profound moral objections to eating meat. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 6:02 am
Furthermore, the GRAG draws support for the ECHR decision of Parry v UK to argue that it is within the margin of appreciation afforded to states on this issue to exclude married applicants from recognition. [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 4:17 am
by Tomasz Targosz One of the recent judgements of the Polish Supreme Court provides a good opportunity to review the basic rules applying to copyright contracts in Poland. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 4:14 am
Activ8-3D (EPLAW) EWPCC deals with unregistered designs: Access plus inspiration need not mean copying: Albert Packaging v Nampak (Class 99) (IPKat) United States US Patent Reform Patent Reform Update: Will the House pass America Invents Act? [read post]
31 May 2011, 4:39 am
(on the application of) v Leeds City Council [2011] EWCA Civ 640 (26 May 2011) Omega SA v Omega Engineering Incorporated [2011] EWCA Civ 645 (27 May 2011) Cala Homes (South) Ltd, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government & Anor [2011] EWCA Civ 639 (27 May 2011) Ridgeland Properties Ltd v Bristol City Council [2011] EWCA Civ 649 (27 May 2011) High Court (Chancery Division) Group Lotus Plc & Anor… [read post]
30 May 2011, 4:55 am
Mountain States/Rosen L.L.C. [read post]
16 May 2011, 1:10 am
Mountain States (Patently-O) Court of Appeal of Michigan – Malpractice: Failure to thoroughly advise in settlement negotiations: Viking Corp. v. [read post]
9 May 2011, 9:23 am
du Ochrony Konkurencji i Konsumentów v Tele 2 Polska sp. z o.o., now Netia SA. [read post]
9 May 2011, 4:28 am
Wares and Services Manual expands (Canadian Trademark Blog) Trade-marks: Use it as registered: Bigras v. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 10:55 pm
Blair J stated that in ordinary disciplinary proceedings, where all that was at stake was the loss of a specific job, Article 6 would not be engaged. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 4:55 am
Antonious v. [read post]
17 Apr 2011, 11:03 pm
Cautious Co v. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 10:00 pm
Section 3 of the Representation of the People Act 1983 remains unamended by the rulings in Hirst v United Kingdom (No 2) (2006) 42 EHRR 849 and Greens and MT v United Kingdom (23 November 2010) that it offends against Article 3 Protocol 1 by imposing a blanket ban on prisoners from participating in elections. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 4:19 am
(IP Dragon) DuPont learns that global IP theft doesn’t stop at the border (China Hearsay) Europe The chocolate menagerie: General Court decides on bunny, reindeer and mouse shapes: Chocoladefabriken Lindt & Sprüngli AG v OHIM (jiplp) ECJ rules on legislative limitations on copyright protection for designs in Europe: Flos SpA v Semeraro Casa e Famiglia SpA (jiplp) AG delivers opinion in Viking Gas A/S v BP Gas A/S concerning trade mark law and refilling of… [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 5:10 am
Murray (IP finance) United States US Patent Reform America Invents Act: First to Invent v. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 12:22 pm
See, for example:Why Airplanes Crash: Aviation Safety in a Changing World by Clinton V. [read post]
