Search for: "State v. Poland"
Results 461 - 480
of 707
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Oct 2011, 1:15 am
W -v- M and S and A NHS Primary Care Trust [COP 1182483] Court of protection: Not in woman in vegetative state’s best interests to remove artificial nutrition and hydration. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 10:00 pm
His suffering and humiliation surpassed that inherent in lawful detention (following Kudla v Poland (2002) 35 E.H.R.R. 11 at [92]) and, in any event, his detention was unlawful from the outset. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 2:24 pm
By total coincidence, while the Kat was citing Daniel v Lions at the LIDC Conference, a whole group of Daniels was being cast to the lions the other end of Europe, in the lovely city of Warsaw. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 5:29 am
Updated |NS v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Principles of Community law) [2011] EUECJ C-493/10 (22 September 2011) - read opinion The Common European Asylum System was designed to establish a fair and effective distribution of the burden on the asylum systems of the EU Member States. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 1:27 am
AG Trstenjak stated that the UK (and Poland) have obligations under the EUCFR. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 10:27 am
By Kristin Poland Filed under: GSU Law Library Tagged: cases [read post]
5 Sep 2011, 1:58 am
– ZAO Gruppa Predpriyatij Ost v. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 4:42 am
Inc. v. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 4:48 am
Phillips v. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 4:48 am
Phillips v. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 11:31 pm
General Protecht Group, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 11:42 pm
Yes, it can be done: Siemens AG v Seagate Technology (Ireland) (PatLit) Poland Court of Conciliation for Internet Domains dismisses complaint brought by Bisazza S.p. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 3:28 pm
Sporrong [Sporrong and Lönnroth v Sweden (1983) 5 EHRR 35] itself) that the presence or absence of compensation is not a separate issue, but is an important element in deciding whether, in authorising the interference in the general interest, the balance struck by the state is fair. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 3:28 pm
Sporrong [Sporrong and Lönnroth v Sweden (1983) 5 EHRR 35] itself) that the presence or absence of compensation is not a separate issue, but is an important element in deciding whether, in authorising the interference in the general interest, the balance struck by the state is fair. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 4:00 am
The Case of the Day is Agudas Chasidei Chabad of the United States v. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 2:43 am
Bugajny v Poland para 56ff) have given further guidance on the practical application of A1P1. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 5:48 am
Baczewski International (USA) Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 11:13 pm
: Dien Ghin Electronic (S) Pte Ltd v Khek Tai Ting (PatLit) South Africa Protecting image rights (IP finance) South Sudan South Sudan: no IP change yet (Afro-IP) United Kingdom EWHC (Pat) finds Select exclusive licensee of patent but patent invalid and not infringed: Select v. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 5:30 am
Jakobski v Poland (December 2010) – read judgment Mahayana Buddhists have profound moral objections to eating meat. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 4:56 am
Becton, Dickinson and Company (Patently-O) Patent malpractice litigation: State versus federal jurisdiction: Magnetek, Inc. v. [read post]
