Search for: "State v. Polk"
Results 41 - 60
of 380
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jan 2010, 8:06 am
The responsibility of the state to provide exculpatory evidence to the defense was articulated in the 1963 Supreme Court ruling in Brady v. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 7:49 am
Segùn la Oficina del Alguacil del Condado de Polk, el conductor de un camiòn de carga Chevrolet 2003 blanco se dirigìa al norte por la State Road 559 cuando se detuvo en el carril para dar vuelta a la derecha. [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 7:16 pm
Some academic critics of Roe v. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 5:59 am
We're particularly partial to the entry that's been dubbed "State of Peepington v. [read post]
17 Feb 2021, 6:00 am
The Second Circuit’s Decision in United States v. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 2:49 am
Las Vegas Limited Partnership v. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 2:57 am
Supreme Court Decides Jones v. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 6:52 pm
Coker, a Voluntary Agreement to Resign from Judicial Office in Lieu of Disciplinary Action: WHEREAS in late December 2012 and early January 2013, complaints and media stories were brought to the Commission’s attention alleging that Judge Coker had engaged in improper ex parte text communications with Polk County Assistant District Attorney Kaycee Jones while Judge Coker presided over the criminal jury trial of State v. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 4:22 pm
New York v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 10:01 pm
Last week, AFCCA heard oral argument in United States v. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 11:24 am
Polk and Maryland Judiciary Battle,” 5 U. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 4:19 pm
State, it can.In a 5-4 opinion with 2 separate dissents, the CCA disregarded its prior holdings in Polk v. [read post]
3 May 2018, 6:21 am
On March 20, 2018, the Supreme Court decided Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 6:25 am
The Supreme Court’s opinion in Lucia v. [read post]
20 Aug 2018, 2:52 pm
District Court Judge Katherine Polk Failla denied Plaintiff-Investors’ attempts in Blackrock Allocation Target Shares et al. v. [read post]
8 Nov 2007, 8:13 am
On Tuesday, the Nevada Supreme Court heard oral argument in the capital habeas case of Flanagan v. [read post]
13 Jan 2010, 11:22 am
Connor, 56 Misc.2d 364, Polk v. [read post]
28 Mar 2023, 9:01 pm
This summary must include (i) the person or persons affected; (ii) the date the incident was discovered and whether it is ongoing; (iii) whether any data was stolen, altered, accessed or used for any unauthorized purpose; (iv) the effect of the incident on the entity’s operations; and (v) whether the incident has been remediated or is currently being remediated. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 8:58 am
(For those unfamiliar with claim construction, see Polk Wagner's introductory lecture.) [read post]
18 Dec 2016, 3:50 am
The customer brought suit in state court in Polk County against the franchisee, Michael P. [read post]
