Search for: "State v. Ponds"
Results 1 - 20
of 436
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 May 2011, 1:19 pm
As described by the Appeals Court, Downing/Salt Pond Partners, L.P., frustrated by two state agencies' restrictions on its development of a coastal residential subdivision in Narragansett, Rhode Island, appeals the district court's dismissal of its Federal takings claims under the Supreme Court's ripeness requirements for such claims, set forth in Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. [read post]
3 May 2012, 8:06 am
I am planning a side trip to see the once pond, now marina. [read post]
2 Oct 2018, 8:00 am
For the little guy in the photo, Weyerhaeuser Company v. [read post]
17 Apr 2009, 3:00 pm
As discussed in our March 13 post, the California Supreme Court issued its much awaited decision in State of California v. [read post]
17 Nov 2007, 8:48 am
State v. [read post]
20 Jul 2016, 9:10 am
State Roy and his friends arrived at a state-owned pond to enjoy the water. [read post]
29 Jul 2008, 7:25 pm
To download a copy of the Appellate Division's decision, please use this link: Franklin v. 2 Guys From Long Pond, Inc. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 12:46 pm
Sierra Club v. [read post]
13 Sep 2007, 7:58 am
[7] Duval v. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 6:00 am
The government denied the subsequent change order request (submitted by Syska), stating that the pond work was in the scope of the original contract and Syska withheld money owed for other aspects of the work to make up the difference for the previously billed pond work. [read post]
17 Jan 2018, 1:16 pm
S.C., Dec. 21, 2017, T.H. v. [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 9:18 am
Agency v. [read post]
7 Apr 2017, 2:15 pm
State of Texas, the State of Texas filed an eminent domain suit to obtain property from Caffe Ribs to use for a storm water detention pond as part of an expansion of Interstate 10. [read post]
7 Apr 2017, 2:15 pm
State of Texas, the State of Texas filed an eminent domain suit to obtain property from Caffe Ribs to use for a storm water detention pond as part of an expansion of Interstate 10. [read post]
10 Oct 2008, 1:36 pm
Washburn student intern Krystle Dalke and I won in State v. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 11:18 am
” Under Part V, “Protection from suffering detriment in employment,” of this law, 47B on “Protected disclosures” states that, “A worker has the right not to be subjected to any detriment by any act, or any deliberate failure to act, by his employer done on the ground that the worker has made a protected disclosure. [read post]
13 Jul 2013, 6:39 pm
In Ministerio Roca Solida v. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 11:18 am
” Under Part V, “Protection from suffering detriment in employment,” of this law, 47B on “Protected disclosures” states that, “A worker has the right not to be subjected to any detriment by any act, or any deliberate failure to act, by his employer done on the ground that the worker has made a protected disclosure. [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 5:42 am
A new decision from the United States District Court in Illinois, Miracle-Pond, et al. v. [read post]
6 Dec 2018, 5:00 am
Supreme Court has sent Weyerhaeuser Company v United States Fish and Wildlife Service, 586 U. [read post]
