Search for: "State v. Poole" Results 81 - 100 of 3,157
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Dec 2012, 5:19 pm by Arina Shulga
The defendants had solicited and pooled public funds with the stated intention of investing approximately 97% of the proceeds in United States Treasury bills, and using the remainder to hedge the account by trading futures contracts on Treasury bills. [read post]
1 Dec 2012, 5:19 pm by Arina Shulga
The defendants had solicited and pooled public funds with the stated intention of investing approximately 97% of the proceeds in United States Treasury bills, and using the remainder to hedge the account by trading futures contracts on Treasury bills. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 6:05 pm by David Lillesand
The United State Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eight Circuit ruled today in Center v. [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 10:42 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
Callaghan, September 22, 2016, Court of Appeal -Fourth Appellate District – State of California More Blog Entries: Alcala v. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 5:08 am by Heidi Henson
In Cumbie v Woody Woo, Inc, a 2010 decision, the Ninth Circuit ruled that the FLSA does not prohibit an employer from instituting a tip pool that includes back-of-the-house workers if that employer pays its employees who share in tips the full minimum wage and does not take a tip credit. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 9:11 am by Evan Mix
”  In light of this significant change, it is highly encouraged that employers – especially those in the Ninth Circuit – seek legal counsel and review their tip pooling arrangements carefully to ensure compliance with the current state of the law. [1] Montano v. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 5:09 pm
Therefore, employers complying with state law minimum wages will not have to worry about the FLSA when constructing tip pools.The case is Cumbie v. [read post]