Search for: "State v. Poole" Results 141 - 160 of 3,228
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jun 2023, 8:41 am by Eugene Volokh
The University of Chicago law school website shows 62 "full time reaching faculty" v. 127 "Lecturers in Law" (another—and, to some ears, a more dignified—term for adjuncts). [read post]
2 Jun 2023, 3:09 pm by John McFarland
Today the Texas Supreme Court agreed to hear Ammonite Oil & Gas Corp. v. [read post]
Here, Professor Buzz Thompson, a global expert on water and natural resources who has served as Special Master for the United States Supreme Court in Montana v. [read post]
16 May 2023, 12:57 pm by Phil Dixon
The defendants were unvaccinated and objected to striking unvaccinated jurors from the jury pool. [read post]
16 May 2023, 11:43 am by Patricia Hughes
Ontario (“Working Families I”) and Working Families Coalition (Canada) Inc. v. [read post]
16 May 2023, 4:00 am by Alan Macek
The Federal Court of Appeal wrote in Salt Canada Inc. v. [read post]
11 May 2023, 5:01 am by Nicholas Weigel
Legal Arguments in the Texas Suit In their motion for summary judgment, plaintiffs in Joseph Van Loon et al. v. [read post]
10 May 2023, 4:00 am by Administrator
Periodically on Thursdays, we present a significant excerpt, usually from a recently published book or journal article. [read post]
7 May 2023, 12:52 am by Florian Mueller
In the United States as well as in Germany, claim construction is resolved by courts as a question of law (not fact). [read post]
4 May 2023, 9:51 pm by Ilya Somin
Kelo was an important decision that drew a massive political backlash (over 80% of the public opposed the ruling, and 45 states enacted eminent domain reform laws in reaction to it) and remains contentious to this day. [read post]
4 May 2023, 10:00 am by James Kachmar
On April 24, 2023, the Ninth Circuit issued its opinion in Epic Games, Inc. v. [read post]
3 May 2023, 9:03 pm by renholding
”[v]The release does not explain what such a response would entail, which is not surprising given that the SEC is neither equipped nor authorized to tell private funds how to manage their risks, let alone to rescue private funds in times of stress. [read post]