Search for: "State v. Powell" Results 301 - 320 of 1,425
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Dec 2013, 7:08 am by chief
In the meantime England have managed to retain (yay) and then lose (boo) the Ashes, so it just goes to show that there are worse things in the world than tardy blog writers.The issue in the two cases is neatly stated by Kitchin LJ at [2]:“The central issue on this appeal is whether the decisions in Manek and Desnousse continue to bind this court in the light of the decisions of the Supreme Court in Manchester City Council v Pinnock [2010] UKSC 45, [2011] 2 AC 104 and Hounslow… [read post]
7 Dec 2008, 7:06 pm
  As the authors observe, Powell’s separate opinion was often viewed by lower courts as stating the holding of the Court. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 5:21 am by The Public Employment Law Press
However, said the court, in any event Supreme Court addressed the merits of Thomas’ amended petition.** See Powell v Board of Educ. of Westbury Union Free School Dist., 91 AD3d 955, summarized at http://publicpersonnellaw.blogspot.com/2012/02/where-arbitration-is-statutorily.htmlThe decision is posted on the Internet at:http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2016/2016_01928.htm______________________ The Discipline Book - A 458 page guide focusing on New York… [read post]
24 Jul 2016, 9:58 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 93339 (SD NY, July 18, 2016), a New York federal district court dismissed an inmate's complaint that he was removed from the kosher diet meal plan after he allegedly took food from the regular meal line.In Powell v. [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 4:49 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
“Buzz” was Justice Rehnquist’s clerk, whom Powell’s clerk stated in another portion of this memo wrote the opinion. [read post]
8 Sep 2007, 9:12 am
Powell, 428 U.S. 465, 494 (1976) ("where the State has provided an opportunity to full and fair litigation of a Fourth Amendment claim, a state prisoner may not be granted federal habeas corpus relief on the ground that evidence obtained in an unconstitutional search or seizure was introduced at his trial"); see also, United States v. [read post]