Search for: "State v. Price" Results 181 - 200 of 13,186
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jan 2024, 4:31 pm
The price is too high.Now, in this particular case, I agree that the failure to provide post-seizure notice in the particular manner required by state law doesn't require suppression or invalidation of the conviction. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 10:59 am by Keith Szeliga
Welcome back to the Cost Corner, where we provide practical insight into the complex cost and pricing requirements that apply to Government contractors. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 8:52 am by Samuel Bray
Palmer, especially since most state courts at the time went the other way (that note quotes from an article in the American Journal of Legal History by William Meyer, who has a very interesting forthcoming book on Riggs v. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 12:09 am by Xandra Kramer
The legal bases of the claim are therefore abuse of economic dominance in the market (Article 102 TFEU) and prohibited vertical price fixing (Article 101 TFEU). [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 12:16 pm
See [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 12:16 pm
See [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
The Myrontana legislature legalized same-sex marriage in 2010, five years before the Supreme Court ruling in Obergefell v. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 1:19 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Short Reports Have a substantial immediate impact on stock price. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 12:47 pm by Daniel J. Gilman
The downstream product market is relatively competitive, so some of those efficiency gains will be passed on to consumers in the form of lower prices. [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 9:30 pm by ernst
  Mark Graber disputes the significance of the latest discovery of Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman related to whether the President is an Office of the United States for purposes of Section 3 of the fourteenth Amendment (Balkinization).ICYMI: The failed attempt to rename Brown v. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 6:47 am by Dan Bressler
” “Zappia attempted to make the case that Skadden’s conflict of interest compromised its independence and had a deleterious impact on its approach to Myovant and its shareholders, and that it therefore influenced the special committee to accept a low price for the merger and to refrain from soliciting other potential purchasers. [read post]