Search for: "State v. Price"
Results 141 - 160
of 12,980
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
D.C. Circuit Review – Reviewed: selective prosecution under § 1983, January 6 sentencings, and more.
23 Aug 2023, 7:55 pm
United States v. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 9:52 am
Schutte v. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 4:00 am
The SEC’s response to the Chamber of Commerce’s petition for review of the Share Repurchase Disclosure Modernization rulemaking, whose timing coincided with the imposition of an excise tax on buybacks under the Inflation Reduction Act, at length seeks to refute the Chamber’s First Amendment claims, while also seeking to bolster the rigor of the agency’s economic analysis (Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America v. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 3:00 am
Scalise v. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 9:01 pm
In the wake of the Supreme Court’s decision in SFFA v. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 2:14 pm
V. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 12:51 pm
Media Holdings, LLC v. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 4:34 am
Franklin v Hafftka, 140 AD3d 922, 924). [read post]
20 Aug 2023, 9:05 pm
In West Virginia v. [read post]
19 Aug 2023, 6:30 am
In the wake of the Supreme Court’s decision in SFFA v. [read post]
19 Aug 2023, 6:30 am
In the wake of the Supreme Court’s decision in SFFA v. [read post]
18 Aug 2023, 7:37 pm
See Price v. [read post]
17 Aug 2023, 11:03 am
Other options include Engel & Völkers, HomeEspaña, and SBD Immobles. [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 11:57 am
From Doe v. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 10:10 pm
Instead, we are now faced with a proposal that--as IP Europe's submission accurately notes and documents--is all about price regulation by two EU institutions, with the stated goal of lowering those prices. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 9:15 pm
” In City of Fort Lauderdale Police and Firefighters’ Retirement Sys. v. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 4:30 am
See Minister of Health & Ors v Treatment Action Campaign & Others (No. 2). [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 2:47 am
” Dye v. [read post]
13 Aug 2023, 12:43 pm
See Hess v. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 11:02 am
’” United States v. 564.54 Acres of Land, 441 U.S. 506, 510–11 (1979) (quoting Olson v. [read post]