Search for: "State v. Printz"
Results 1 - 20
of 187
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Sep 2020, 2:46 pm
United States (355-368) Printz v. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 11:35 am
Usery (1976) but in lesser-known opinions like New York v. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 8:14 pm
As the quotation from Printz suggests, Judge Vinson is extending Printz's an anti-commandeering principle from states to private persons. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 8:43 pm
If the answer is “always yes,” the state autonomy protected by Printz v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 3:19 am
Setting a precedent with important implications today, the Supreme Court’s decision from 1997 in Printz v. [read post]
15 May 2018, 6:32 am
The pioneering case was New York v. [read post]
16 May 2018, 4:11 pm
Justice Alito’s opinion in Murphy v. [read post]
12 Dec 2022, 9:37 am
, State v. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 4:01 am
(The doctrine’s origin in an obscure amicus brief may also explain why lawyers speak of the Printz doctrine rather than the New York v. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 8:06 am
United States and Printz v. [read post]
20 Oct 2009, 9:22 am
Federalism skeptics have argued for years that Printz is a trivial entitlement because the feds can costlessly bypass the states by enforcing national law with their own federal personnel. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 9:52 am
With the Supreme Court poised to decide Shelby County v. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 9:01 pm
Five years later, in Printz v. [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 11:11 am
United States</i> and <i>Nance v. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 6:14 am
United States (the anti-commandeering doctrine) and NFIB v. [read post]
22 Jul 2016, 3:30 am
” Printz v. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 10:47 pm
United States, Printz v. [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 10:15 am
However, the Court has held that the feds may not commandeer the cooperation of state agents, in Mack and Printz v. [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 8:23 pm
United States and Printz v. [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 2:03 pm
First, Howlett v. [read post]
