Search for: "State v. Prouse" Results 21 - 40 of 52
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jun 2014, 3:32 pm by Stephen Bilkis
To conclude that officers in the field must follow a plan which is set in place by the higher echelons, and then to conclude that the officers in the field may cavalierly disregard certain key elements of that plan, whether intentionally or unintentionally, would be to countenance the "standardless and unconstrained discretion" and "evil" the Supreme Court spoke about in the case of Delaware v Prouse,, 440 US 648, 661 [1979]. [read post]
10 Aug 2016, 7:49 am by Markus Sermons
The likely reason that the supervising officer let the driver go about his business is that the United States Supreme Court in the case of Delaware v. [read post]
10 Aug 2016, 7:49 am by Markus Sermons
The likely reason that the supervising officer let the driver go about his business is that the United States Supreme Court in the case of Delaware v. [read post]