Search for: "State v. Public Employees Retirement Board"
Results 1 - 20
of 706
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Mar 2016, 6:00 am
Retirement Board of the Santa Barbara County Employees Retirement System (Cal.App. 2/2/16), which concerns the effective date of a public employee's disability retirement. [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 6:00 am
Retirement Board of the Santa Barbara County Employees Retirement System (Cal.App. 2/2/16), which concerns the effective date of a public employee's disability retirement. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 11:19 pm
Reemployment of retired State and municipal public employees by the State or a political subdivision of the StateNew York State Department of Civil Service - Division of Staffing Services General Information Bulletin No. 09-07Except in cases involving the election to public office and employment in one of the specified position listed in §150, §150 of the Civil Service Law mandates the suspension of a retired… [read post]
16 Jun 2009, 4:00 am
Reemployment of retired State and municipal public employees by the State or a political subdivision of the StateNew York State Department of Civil Service - Division of Staffing Services General Information Bulletin No. 09-07Except in cases involving the election to public office and employment in one of the specified position listed in §150, §150 of the Civil Service Law mandates the suspension of a… [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 4:00 am
" The court said that the language of Retirement and Social Security Law §212 explicitly allows New York public employees — including justices of the Supreme Court — to retire in place and continue to work while collecting their state pension, rejecting the Board’s argument that §212(1) implicitly permits state employers, including the Board, to require employees to bargain away their… [read post]
17 Nov 2022, 5:30 am
Social Security Administration’s disability determination not binding on a public retirement system of this State. [read post]
17 Nov 2022, 5:30 am
Social Security Administration’s disability determination not binding on a public retirement system of this State. [read post]
9 May 2022, 5:00 am
These petitioners became sanitation workers and were placed in Tier 4 of the New York City Employees' Retirement System [NYCERS] based on their prior participation in public employee retirement systems.In 2016, NYCERS determined that it had made an error, and reclassified Petitioners' memberships in NYCERS from the Tier 4 Sanitation 20-Year retirement plan [SA-20] pursuant to Retirement and Social Security Law Article 15 to the… [read post]
9 May 2022, 5:00 am
These petitioners became sanitation workers and were placed in Tier 4 of the New York City Employees' Retirement System [NYCERS] based on their prior participation in public employee retirement systems.In 2016, NYCERS determined that it had made an error, and reclassified Petitioners' memberships in NYCERS from the Tier 4 Sanitation 20-Year retirement plan [SA-20] pursuant to Retirement and Social Security Law Article 15 to the… [read post]
9 May 2022, 5:00 am
These petitioners became sanitation workers and were placed in Tier 4 of the New York City Employees' Retirement System [NYCERS] based on their prior participation in public employee retirement systems.In 2016, NYCERS determined that it had made an error, and reclassified Petitioners' memberships in NYCERS from the Tier 4 Sanitation 20-Year retirement plan [SA-20] pursuant to Retirement and Social Security Law Article 15 to the… [read post]
9 May 2022, 5:00 am
These petitioners became sanitation workers and were placed in Tier 4 of the New York City Employees' Retirement System [NYCERS] based on their prior participation in public employee retirement systems.In 2016, NYCERS determined that it had made an error, and reclassified Petitioners' memberships in NYCERS from the Tier 4 Sanitation 20-Year retirement plan [SA-20] pursuant to Retirement and Social Security Law Article 15 to the… [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 7:23 am
Withdrawing from membership in a New York State public retirement systemRichardson v NYC Employees’ Retirement System, NYS Supreme Court, Justice Gammerman, [Not selected for publication in the Official Reports]A member of a public retirement system may lose his or her eligibility for significant benefits if he or she decides to withdraw his or her contributions upon leaving public employment. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 1:48 pm
Perhaps the well-publicized state of public pensions in California has started to give some pause to the usual practice. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 5:39 am
Inability to obtain a timely waiver to reemploy a person receiving a retirement allowance from a public retirement system of this State does not result in a breach of contract LaSalle v Board of Educ. of Bridgehampton Union Free School Dist., 2011 NY Slip Op 02632, Appellate Division, Second Department Edward J. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 6:54 am
Matheny v. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 9:00 am
The Internal Revenue Service has begun issuing opinion/advisory letters for pre-approved defined benefit retirement plans restated for the 2012 Cumulative List, and changes the pre-approved plan program for cash balance plans.The NY State Employees' Retirement System and the NY State Teachers' Retirement System together with the NYC public retirement systems, are defined benefit plans.In contrast, the New York… [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 4:03 am
[iv]See Education Law §390.3[v] When it was established in 1964 then professional employees could continue in their respective State retirement system or elect to participate in ORP. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 10:09 am
Alameda County Employees’ Retirement Assn. [read post]
6 Mar 2009, 9:23 pm
Staff support for the Task Force shall be provided by the State agencies that serve on the Task Force, and by the Executive Chamber.The Task Force may consult with other interested parties, including members of the legislature, representatives of organized labor not represented on the Task Force such as uniformed public employees and teachers, other government associations such as the School Boards Association and Government Finance Officers Association, academics… [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 5:00 am
Accordingly, said the court, the Supreme Court properly denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.* The State Board cited Internal Revenue Code cited §457 of the Internal Revenue Code as the authority for establishing the Suffolk County Public Employees Deferred Compensation Plan. [read post]
