Search for: "State v. Purcell"
Results 41 - 60
of 184
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Aug 2022, 3:45 am
Where, as here, the defendants submitted evidentiary material in support of that branch of their cross motion which was pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(7) to dismiss the complaint, the criterion becomes whether the plaintiff has a cause of action, not whether one is stated (see Guggenheimer v Ginzburg, 43 NY2d 268, 275; Bua v Purcell & Ingrao, P.C., 99 AD3d 843, 845). [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 4:10 am
In Kravitz v. [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 7:11 am
The first argument, in Jones v. [read post]
1 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm
Supreme Court’s June ruling in Moore v. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 10:42 am
The oral argument on Tuesday in Washington State Department of Licensing v. [read post]
30 Apr 2008, 3:13 am
Rundle Ltd. [2008] EWCA Civ 429 (28 April 2008) Consistent Group Ltd v Kalwak & Ors [2008] EWCA Civ 430 (29 April 2008) Winchester College & Anor, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs [2008] EWCA Civ 431 (29 April 2008) Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) G v R [2008] EWCA Crim 922 (29 April 2008) Purcell v R [2008] EWCA Crim 894 (29 April 2008) Diamond, R v [2008] EWCA… [read post]
26 Oct 2006, 8:32 am
Instead, the State relies on last Friday's opinion in Purcell v. [read post]
28 Oct 2006, 6:50 am
Although the stay application asserts the Attorney General's authority to appeal the TRO "in the Secretary of State's name" (p. 9), apparently even against his wishes, the Attorney General cites no authority for this proposition.- The Attorney General's brief relies heavily on the Supreme Court's ruling in Purcell v. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 9:30 pm
" The recording of the Supreme Court Historical Society’s commemoration of Juneteenth, a “conversation on the lynching of Ed Johnson in 1906 and United States v. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 4:20 am
In Harris v Barbera 2018 NY Slip Op 05023 Decided on July 5, 2018 Appellate Division, Second Department (without much explanation) held that while the complaint stated a cause of action for failing to illuminate marital dissipation, the proofs were not. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 3:22 am
“Allegations regarding an act of deceit or intent to deceive must be stated with particularity” (Bill Birds, Inc. v Stein Law Firm, P.C., 164 AD3d 635, 637 [2018], affd 35 NY3d 173 [2020]; see CPLR 3016 [b]; Palmieri v Perry, Van Etten, Rozanski & Primavera, LLP, 200 AD3d 785, 787 [2021]). [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 8:48 am
Gore, recognizing the right to have one's vote counted in a recount according to uniform voting procedures; and Purcell v. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 10:43 am
In Purcell v. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 1:18 pm
At the outset of his argument, Washington Solicitor General Noah Purcell stated that “Defendants have pursued the wrong remedy by seeking a stay in this court, rather than mandamus. [read post]
15 May 2020, 4:30 am
Second, Colorado Department of State v. [read post]
19 Aug 2022, 4:42 am
“Conclusory allegations of damages or injuries predicated on speculation cannot suffice for a malpractice action” (Bua v Purcell & Ingrao, P.C., 99 AD3d at 848; see Janker v Silver, Forrester & Lesser, P.C., 135 AD3d at 909). [read post]
15 May 2008, 12:51 am
"Indiana's Court of Appeals decided in Purcell v. [read post]
CA11: Damage to door in attempt to enter, without entry, is de minimus for Fourth Amendment purposes
28 Jan 2012, 9:15 pm
Wright, 97 S.Ct. 1401, 1414 (1977); see also United States v. [read post]
6 Jun 2010, 7:19 am
Commerce Energy has been updated to include the opinion and a recap by Stanford’s Annasara Purcell, and we have also updated the page for Carr v. [read post]
12 Oct 2016, 12:56 pm
Purcell v. [read post]
