Search for: "State v. Purcell"
Results 61 - 80
of 184
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jul 2023, 5:17 am
” “”‘Conclusory allegations of damages or injuries predicated on speculation cannot suffice for a malpractice action, and dismissal is warranted where the allegations in the complaint are merely conclusory and speculative'” (Denisco v Uysal, 195 AD3d 989, 991, quoting Bua v Purcell & Ingrao, P.C., 99 AD3d 843, 848; see York v Frank, 209 AD3d 804, 807). [read post]
Jail suicide following alleged false arrest and striking with baton was not a Fourth Amendment claim
29 Mar 2007, 7:25 pm
United States v. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 9:59 am
See United States v. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 11:55 am
Purcell (1967) 67 Cal.2d 551. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 9:16 am
First, the injunction violated the Purcell principle by altering state election laws close to an election. [read post]
25 Sep 2007, 12:34 pm
Marion County Election Board (07-21) and Indiana Democratic Party v. [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 6:23 am
In Merrill v. [read post]
26 Aug 2009, 4:55 am
In Rentech Steel LLC v. [read post]
20 Jun 2007, 11:21 am
Purcell v. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 10:31 am
Purcell, issued on November 27.The plaintiff is a Jewish inmate at a state correctional facility. [read post]
1 Dec 2015, 3:11 pm
., U.S. ex rel Purcell v. [read post]
1 Dec 2015, 3:11 pm
., U.S. ex rel Purcell v. [read post]
12 Apr 2020, 9:01 pm
To think that the Purcell principle controlled in RNC v. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 1:37 pm
Brayton Purcell, Kazan McClain…). [read post]
17 Oct 2022, 3:00 am
Further, the plaintiff’s allegation that she sustained actual and ascertainable damages as a result of the defendants’ negligence also was conclusory and speculative (see Katsoris v Bodnar & Milone, LLP, 186 AD3d at 1506; Bua v Purcell & Ingrao, P.C., 99 AD3d 843, 847-848). [read post]
13 Jul 2022, 3:44 am
” “Here, the plaintiff failed to state causes of action sounding in breach of contract, legal malpractice, breach of fiduciary duty, and fraud, as she failed to adequately allege the element of [*2]damages with respect to each of those causes of action (see Denisco v Uysal, 195 AD3d 989 [2021]; McSpedon v Levine, 158 AD3d 618, 621 [2018]; Bua v Purcell & Ingrao, P.C., 99 AD3d 843, 848 [2012]; Smith v Chase… [read post]
4 May 2020, 7:12 am
Well, unexpected if you didn’t read what the lower courts were doing and only focused on certain opposition to the Supreme Court’s decision in RNC v. [read post]
16 May 2017, 8:03 am
Mandel (1972), or Kerry v. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 10:32 am
”) But as one of us explains today in a Justia column (and as Justice Ginsburg’s majority opinion in Arizona Legislature v. [read post]
30 Aug 2016, 12:31 pm
The first case the Court decided, Purcell v. [read post]
