Search for: "State v. Putnam" Results 1 - 20 of 158
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Apr 2019, 4:04 am by Edith Roberts
Briefly: At Reason’s Volokh Conspiracy blog, Samuel Bray looks at Putnam Investments, LLC v. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 4:16 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Co., 30 NY3d 704, 710 [2018]; Fourth Ocean Putnam Corp. v Interstate Wrecking Co., 66 NY2d 38, 44 [1985]). [read post]
22 Feb 2019, 7:03 am by Aurora Barnes
Putnam Investments, LLC v. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 11:00 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Cornelius, 473 U.S. at 812–13; see also, e.g., Rossignol, 316 F.3d at 521 (holding that sheriff’s deputies engaged in viewpoint discrimination when they seized an issue of a newspaper that criticized the county sheriff’s and his deputies’ performance of their official duties); Putnam Pit, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 4:30 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Allegations regarding an act of deceit or intent to deceive must be stated with particularity (see CPLR 3016[b]; Facebook, Inc. v DLA Piper LLP [US], 134 AD3d 610, 615; Armstrong v Blank Rome LLP, 126 AD3d 427; Putnam County Temple & Jewish Ctr., Inc. v Rhinebeck Sav. [read post]
23 May 2018, 3:59 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“Allegations regarding an act of deceit or intent to deceive must be stated with particularity” (Facebook, Inc. v DLA Piper LLP [US], 134 AD3d 610, 615 [2015]; see Putnam County Temple & Jewish Ctr., Inc. v Rhinebeck Sav. [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 4:36 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“Allegations regarding an act of deceit or intent to deceive must be stated with particularity” (Facebook, Inc. v DLA Piper LLP [US], 134 AD3d 610, 615 [2015]; see Putnam County Temple & Jewish Ctr., Inc. v Rhinebeck Sav. [read post]