Search for: "State v. Queen" Results 1 - 20 of 2,518
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jul 2009, 4:49 am
Queens College of the City University of New York not subject to the City's Human Right Law because it is a State entityJattan v Queens Coll. of City Univ. of N.Y., 2009 NY Slip Op 05746, decided on July 7, 2009, Appellate Division, Second DepartmentLincoln Jattan, sued Queens College of the City University of New York to recover damages for employment discrimination in violation of the New York State Human Rights Law [Executive Law … [read post]
1 Aug 2009, 9:01 pm
Jattan v Queens Coll. of City Univ. of N.Y., 2009 NY Slip Op 05746, decided on July 7, 2009, Appellate Division, Second Department Lincoln Jattan, sued Queens College of the City University of New York to recover damages for employment... [read post]
21 May 2022, 2:00 am by Katharine Van Tassel
Brown (Queen's University Belfast), Disability and Access to Sex Workers: Secretary of State for Justice v A Local Authority and others, 72 N. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 2:33 am
Regina (F) v Secretary of State for Justice Regina (Thompson) v Secretary of State for the Home Department Queen’s Bench “In the absence of any mechanism for review, placing an offender on the sex offenders register indefinitely was a disproportionate interference with the right to respect for private and family life. [read post]
3 Nov 2009, 2:28 am
Regina (Chester) v Secretary of State for Justice and Another Queen’s Bench Division “An English court would not make a declaration that existing national legislation was incompatible with the European Convention on Human Rights where there was a ruling by a Scottish court in respect of the same or similar legislation and where the government was in [...] [read post]
9 Aug 2017, 12:59 pm by Margaret Wood
” (R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union [2017] UKSC 5 ¶77 150). [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 1:55 am
Regina (Bary) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; Regina (Al Fawwaz) v Same Queen's Bench Divisional Court “There was no common standard for what did or did not amount to inhuman or degrading treatment throughout the many different countries in the world. [read post]
9 Jul 2007, 2:33 am
Secretary of State for the Home Department Queen’s Bench Division “The withdrawal, without notice or consultation, of the ex gratia scheme for compensation for miscarriages of justice was not unlawful. [read post]
30 May 2008, 1:33 am
Regina (Smith) v Assistant Deputy Coroner for Oxfordshire; Secretary of State for Defence v Same Queen’s Bench Division “The right to life, protected by article 2 of the European Convention on Human Rights, could extend to members of the Armed Forces, wherever they might be; whether it did so would depend on the circumstances of the particular case. [read post]
28 May 2008, 1:15 am
Regina (G) v Nottingham Healthcare NHS Trust; Regina (N) v Secretary of State for Health; Regina (B) v Nottingham Healthcare NHS Trust Queen’s Bench Divisional Court “Preventing detained mental patients from smoking was not a breach of article 8, right to respect for private and family life, or article 14, prohibiting discrimination, of the European Convention on Human Rights. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 8:12 am
Joyce v Secretary of State for Health Queen’s Bench Division “Where a care worker challenged a finding of misconduct which had resulted in her being placed by the Secretary of State for Health on a list of those considered unsuitable to work with vulnerable adults, the Care Standards Tribunal was entitled, on appeal, to consider allegations of misconduct not entertained by the secretary of state, provided it acted fairly. [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 1:34 am
Regina (Shields) v Secretary of State for Justice Queen’s Bench Divisional Court “The Secretary of State for Justice did have power and jurisdiction to consider granting a pardon under the Royal Prerogative in respect of a person convicted and sentenced in a foreign court but transferred to the United Kingdom to serve his sentence. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 3:42 am by sally
Regina (Quila) v Secretary of State for the Home Department Queen’s Bench Division “Age discrimination against immigrant spouses aged under 21 was justified. [read post]
9 Apr 2008, 1:25 am
Regina (Tabernacle) v Secretary of State for Defence Queen’s Bench Divisional Court “A ban on innocuous activities on publicly accessible land owned by the Ministry of Defence was unlawful. [read post]
17 Dec 2007, 3:23 am
Secretary of State for the Home Department v AF (No 2) Queen’s Bench Division   “A judge who had decided that the making of a nonderogating control order was flawed was not for that reason disqualified from reconsidering the case when it was remitted after a successful appeal. [read post]