Search for: "State v. Quick" Results 1 - 20 of 5,426
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Apr 2024, 11:04 pm by Richard Frank
Which brings us to a quick review of applicable regulatory takings law. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 11:33 am by Josh Blackman
While States have substantial authority to regulate land use, see Village of Euclid v. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 4:55 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
”As Gelwan was not a party in the federal action ( Gelmin v Quicke, 224 AD2d 481 [2d Dept 1996] [“party” refers to party in action]), and as the alleged misconduct occurred during the federal action and not here ( Chibcha Rest., Inc. v David A. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 7:28 pm by michael
Using a small business or subchapter V filing can speed up the chapter 11 bankruptcy process as well as bring down the cost. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am by admin
Initially, post-Daubert, federal courts were quick to excuse the absence of epidemiology for a novel claim. [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by Joseph Margulies
I was also counsel—though not lead counsel—in United States v. [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 10:31 am by Gregory Weber
GAO also noted that the United States Court of Federal Claims recently held in Myriddian, LLC v. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 4:00 am by Administrator
In the recent case (Taylor v. [read post]
Because Maine officers cannot get a warrant to take someone into protective custody without a crime being committed, Skolfield could not force the face-to-face interaction he needed to temporarily confiscate Card’s weapons under the state’s yellow flag law. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 12:05 am by Josh Richman
Since Kash has written several hundred pages about what Clearview did, we wanted to start with a quick explanation. [read post]
24 Mar 2024, 5:19 am by Frank Cranmer
  Quick links Cloisters Chambers: Discrimination, belief and the “fundamental party rights”: the judgment in Ali v Green Party of England and Wales (i.e. [read post]