Search for: "State v. Quila"
Results 21 - 27
of 27
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Oct 2011, 12:53 am
AXA General Insurance Ltd & Ors v Lord Ad [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 12:59 pm
R (Quila & Anor) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and R (Bibi & Anor) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 8 – 9 June 2011. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 5:38 am
TTAB Affirms Mere Descriptiveness Refusal of "TEA QUILA" for Alcoholic BeveragesTTAB Overrules Disclaimer Requirement for BENEDIKTINER for Beer and Food ServicesTest Your TTAB Judge-Ability: Is "O-RING CONDOM" Merely Descriptive of Condoms? [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 1:15 am
’ Forced married is not yet criminalised in the UK and is generally regulated at civil law. [1] Yesterday, the UK Supreme Court began to hear oral arguments in Bibi v SSHD (reported at High Court and Court of Appeal as Quila v SSHD.) [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 12:02 am
Quila & Anor, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] UKSC 45 (12 October 2011) October 13, 2011 – our post here Home Secretary’s refusal to grant visas to non-resident spouses under a certain age breached their right to family life under Article 8 of the Convention. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 10:59 pm
H. and Others v. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 2:31 am
But in a short few years, forced marriage – and indeed the family life of South Asian Britons in particular – has become the subject of a significant regulatory web, involving aspects of family law, child law, the law of vulnerable adults, criminal law and immigration regulation (see Quila v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] UKSC 45). [read post]
