Search for: "State v. Quilling" Results 181 - 200 of 268
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 May 2013, 10:45 am by Harold O'Grady
The legislation seeks to reverse the decision of Quill Corp. v. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 4:46 am
From the days of Geoffrey through 2011, the states were largely victorious in corporate income tax nexus cases involving "foreign" holding companies. [read post]
18 Dec 2012, 10:07 am by Tracy Coenen
Quilling, 130 Wis. 318, 110 N.W. 173, 176 (1907). [read post]
9 Nov 2012, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
” Three years later, in Back to the Internet Taxation Future, reacting to a reappearance of the proposal to permit state 1 to require retailers in state 2 with no state 1 connection to be taxed by state 1, I explained why progress had not been made, pointing out the inability of legislators and others to distinguish between sales and use taxes, the silliness of claims that internet retailers are not required to collect sales taxes at all for any… [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 1:54 pm by megan
Siler Since 1992, the question of whether a state could require a business to collect and remit sales tax has been governed by the United States Supreme Court’s ruling in Quill v. [read post]
26 May 2012, 2:50 am by SHG
From Roberts' majority opinion in Blueford v. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 12:48 pm
Although recognizing differences from the sales tax collection burden at issue in Quill v. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 6:18 am by Legal Beagle
Buried on Page 85 of Lord Nimmo Smith’s report, it states : “The Advocate Depute telephoned the Lord Advocate, Lord Fraser, who was in London. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 8:30 pm by Paul Steinberg
In particular, the company relied on Quill v North Dakota (1992) and said that there was no tax nexus that would be recognized under US Supreme Court jurisprudence on the matter. [read post]