Search for: "State v. Quilling"
Results 181 - 200
of 259
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jan 2013, 2:43 pm
The only Supreme Court case that attempts to address this issue is Quill Corp. v. [read post]
18 Dec 2012, 10:07 am
Quilling, 130 Wis. 318, 110 N.W. 173, 176 (1907). [read post]
9 Nov 2012, 5:01 am
” Three years later, in Back to the Internet Taxation Future, reacting to a reappearance of the proposal to permit state 1 to require retailers in state 2 with no state 1 connection to be taxed by state 1, I explained why progress had not been made, pointing out the inability of legislators and others to distinguish between sales and use taxes, the silliness of claims that internet retailers are not required to collect sales taxes at all for any… [read post]
22 Oct 2012, 8:15 pm
Based on Quill Corporation v. [read post]
5 Oct 2012, 12:52 pm
United States, No. 11-597 (cert. granted Apr. 2, 2012). [read post]
3 Oct 2012, 7:47 am
In Quill v. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 1:54 pm
Siler Since 1992, the question of whether a state could require a business to collect and remit sales tax has been governed by the United States Supreme Court’s ruling in Quill v. [read post]
26 May 2012, 2:50 am
From Roberts' majority opinion in Blueford v. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 4:43 pm
Citing Quill Corp. v. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 12:48 pm
Although recognizing differences from the sales tax collection burden at issue in Quill v. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 6:18 am
Buried on Page 85 of Lord Nimmo Smith’s report, it states : “The Advocate Depute telephoned the Lord Advocate, Lord Fraser, who was in London. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 8:30 pm
In particular, the company relied on Quill v North Dakota (1992) and said that there was no tax nexus that would be recognized under US Supreme Court jurisprudence on the matter. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 8:16 am
It will likely rely heavily on the 1992 Quill v. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 8:07 pm
In the case, Otis Wayne Phillips v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 5:01 am
In Quill Corp. v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 9:00 pm
Otherwise, the Supreme Court wrote in its 1992 case Quill Corp. v. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 5:39 am
Cooper and Missouri v. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 5:01 am
” Three years later, in Back to the Internet Taxation Future, reacting to a reappearance of the proposal to permit state 1 to require retailers in state 2 with no state 1 connection to be taxed by state 1, I explained why progress had not been made, pointing out the inability of legislators and others to distinguish between sales and use taxes, the silliness of claims that internet retailers are not required to collect sales taxes at all for any… [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 10:28 am
All of the franchisor’s franchisees in Iowa were independent businesses that licensed their use of the franchisor’s trademark and related system.The franchisor protested the assessment of the income tax, arguing that, in Quill Corp. v. [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 9:00 pm
In Quill Corp. v. [read post]
