Search for: "State v. Quilling" Results 221 - 240 of 264
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jan 2011, 2:04 pm
Supreme Court has endorsed the requirement of physical presence in the area of state sales and use taxes, as held in the 1992 decision Quill Corp. v. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 12:55 pm
The Iowa Supreme Court recently handed down a decision in the case of Kentucky Fried Chicken v. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 12:55 pm
The Iowa Supreme Court recently handed down a decision in the case of Kentucky Fried Chicken v. [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 9:00 pm
From Tax Update Blog: State taxing authorities have long despised the Supreme Court's ruling in Quill v. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 6:02 am by Joe Kristan
State taxing authorities have long despised the Supreme Court's ruling in Quill v. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 10:49 am by Courtney Minick
It turns out that a 1992 US Supreme Court Case, Quill Corp. v. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 10:49 am by Courtney Minick
It turns out that a 1992 US Supreme Court Case, Quill Corp. v. [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 9:00 pm
Otherwise, the Court held in its 1992 case Quill Corp. v. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 10:47 am by Ken Chan
Congress makes the following findings: (1) States should be encouraged to simplify their sales and use tax systems. (2) As a matter of economic policy and basic fairness, similar sales transactions should be treated equally, without regard to the manner in which sales are transacted, whether in person, through the mail, over the telephone, on the Internet, or by other means. (3) Congress may facilitate such equal taxation consistent with the United States Supreme Court’s… [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 7:45 pm by BLOG
” However, the United States Supreme Court upheld in its 1992 ruling on Quill Corp v. [read post]
18 Jul 2010, 8:18 am by Richard Keyt
Supreme Court case is Quill Corporation v. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
” Though she gives no citation so that one can determine which Supreme Court case she wants to highlight, she surely is referring to Quill Corp. v. [read post]