Search for: "State v. Quilling" Results 81 - 100 of 258
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jan 2011, 9:00 pm
From Tax Update Blog: State taxing authorities have long despised the Supreme Court's ruling in Quill v. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 11:58 am by LindaMBeale
The best answer, then, would be for the Supreme Court to revisit its conclusion in the 1992 case Quill Corporation v North Dakota, which required a physical presence in order for states to mandate collection of their sales taxes by companies that make sales to their residents. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 3:22 pm by Ilya Shapiro
Moreover, overturning bad precedent in and of itself isn’t bad — when old cases are really wrong and create unworkable legal regimes, they deserve to be overturned — but here the court says that 1992’s Quill v. [read post]
To answer this question, the Court must decide whether to abrogate its holding in Quill Corp. v. [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 5:45 am by Kevin Kaufman
Illinois Department of Revenue (1967) and Quill Corp. v. [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 6:35 am by Dan Carvajal
The Supreme Court’s 1992 Quill Corp. v. [read post]
9 Apr 2007, 12:14 pm
Revenue (1967) and Quill v.Heitkamp(1992), the Supreme Court had held that states could not impose sales and use taxes on corporations unless there was a physical presence in that state. [read post]
18 Jul 2010, 8:18 am by Richard Keyt
Supreme Court case is Quill Corporation v. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 2:57 am by Scott Bomboy
Those Internet businesses believe a 1992 Supreme Court decision, Quill Corp. v. [read post]