Search for: "State v. Quilling" Results 161 - 180 of 264
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jun 2018, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
As always, this goes back to a very bad precedent.In my first year of being a tax law professor (2003–04), I attended an academic conference in which another new legal scholar was discussing a Supreme Court case from 1992 called Quill (Quill Corp. v. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 9:22 am
Department of Revenue of Illinois, 386 U.S. 753 (1967), and Quill Corp. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 9:05 am by Daniel Hemel
Even more remarkably, one of those decades-old decisions — Quill v. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 9:00 pm
Otherwise, the Court held in its 1992 case Quill Corp. v. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 3:07 am by NCC Staff
Some Internet businesses believed a 1992 Supreme Court decision, Quill Corp. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 3:08 am by Scott Bomboy
Those Internet businesses believe a 1992 Supreme Court decision, Quill Corp. v. [read post]
15 Oct 2019, 7:19 am by Kevin Kaufman
Pennsylvania has historically interpreted the Quill Corp. v. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 10:47 am by Ken Chan
Congress makes the following findings: (1) States should be encouraged to simplify their sales and use tax systems. (2) As a matter of economic policy and basic fairness, similar sales transactions should be treated equally, without regard to the manner in which sales are transacted, whether in person, through the mail, over the telephone, on the Internet, or by other means. (3) Congress may facilitate such equal taxation consistent with the United States Supreme Court’s… [read post]
31 Jan 2008, 10:05 pm
This perspective leads me to defend Quill Corporation v. [read post]
17 Apr 2011, 11:17 pm by cf
This agreement simplifies state tax systems, removes burdens to interstate commerce that are defined in the United States Supreme Court decision in Quill Corp. v. [read post]
10 May 2013, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
” Three years later, in Back to the Internet Taxation Future, reacting to a reappearance of the proposal to permit state 1 to require retailers in state 2 with no state 1 connection to be taxed by state 1, I explained why progress had not been made, pointing out the inability of legislators and others to distinguish between sales and use taxes, the silliness of claims that internet retailers are not required to collect sales taxes at all for any… [read post]
9 Nov 2012, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
” Three years later, in Back to the Internet Taxation Future, reacting to a reappearance of the proposal to permit state 1 to require retailers in state 2 with no state 1 connection to be taxed by state 1, I explained why progress had not been made, pointing out the inability of legislators and others to distinguish between sales and use taxes, the silliness of claims that internet retailers are not required to collect sales taxes at all for any… [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 11:54 am by Hannah Kris
In an anticipated decision, the Supreme Court overturned precedent, Quill Corporation v. [read post]