Search for: "State v. Quinn" Results 181 - 200 of 888
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 May 2018, 3:50 am by Edith Roberts
United States, in which the justices considered the scope of tribal fishing rights; bankruptcy case Lamar, Archer & Cofrin, LLP v. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 1:12 am by Jon Gelman
Quinn, a case that could upend agreements with state governments that allow taxpayer-funded home-care workers to unionize.Those deals have helped boost public sector unions in several states at a time when overall union membership is declining. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 5:21 am by Amy Howe
Briefly: In The New York Times, Linda Greenhouse discusses last week’s grant in the two cell phone privacy cases, United States v. [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 7:03 pm
Quinn, a case in which the plaintiffs argue that Olmstead forbids the State of Illinois from closing institutions for people with developmental disabilities. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 8:42 am
Coakley (Mark Rienzi), and the lawyer for the state of Illinois (who was defending the state’s mandatory union dues program) in Harris v. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 4:00 am by Victoria VanBuren
  The Winter 2009 edition of “Alternative Resolutions” features the following articles: Arbitration Empirical Studies The San Antonio Court of Appeals: A Substantively Unconscionable Provision in an Arbitration Agreement Should Have Been Severed, Allowing Compulsory Arbitration to Go Forward Hall Street Applied To Texas General Arbitration Act In Quinn v. [read post]
9 Aug 2015, 8:00 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 8142 (TX App., Aug. 4, 2015), a Texas state appeals court in a 2-1 decision affirmed the dismissal on statute of limitations grounds of a suit by an inmate who is a member of the House of Yahweh who was refused kosher meals.In Quinn v. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 8:52 am by Stefanie Levine
Written by Gene Quinn (of and Practice Center Contributor) The United States Patent and Trademark Office has provided an update to its Examination Guidelines concerning the law of obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 in light of precedential decisions from the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued since the 2007 decision by the United States Supreme Court in KSR Int’l Co. v. [read post]
18 Nov 2006, 9:34 pm
If the NC game  were played next week, it should feature Ohio State v. [read post]