Search for: "State v. Quinn"
Results 341 - 360
of 780
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Sep 2012, 8:45 am
Self-described as the “largest [law firm] in the United States devoted solely to business litigation,” the firm recently made headlines as being counsel for Samsung in the much-watched Samsung v. [read post]
1 Sep 2017, 6:49 am
JESSICA PARKER VALENTINE AND BRYAN L. [read post]
6 Dec 2008, 3:44 pm
" United States v. [read post]
5 Feb 2019, 2:03 pm
At the recent FTC v. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 11:26 pm
Quinn put his fingers into that wound. [read post]
17 Jun 2007, 12:09 pm
In a different post, Quinn writes about KSR v. [read post]
29 Jun 2016, 12:36 pm
Commentary on the four-four tie in United States v. [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 10:35 am
Quinn, 410 N.J. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 1:03 pm
Quinn. [read post]
16 May 2018, 6:07 am
That decision, Harris v. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 12:46 pm
ESN v. [read post]
30 Jan 2018, 5:32 am
” For the ABA Journal, Mark Walsh reports that one of those cases, United States v. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 4:43 am
” In CTS Corp. v. [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 2:35 am
Quinn (May 13) GUEST-POST PART I | States’ Rights, Big Business and the Nature of Arbitration: AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 11:36 am
Quinn, his criticism became much more strident. [read post]
22 Aug 2008, 1:58 pm
But Riverside also has a Federal Court outpost, and that's where they've been trying the Mattel v. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 6:26 am
That decision is Mink v. [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 12:19 am
” Neubronner v. [read post]
6 Mar 2011, 7:00 pm
Pat Quinn is widely expected to either sign or veto legislation within days that would formally abolish the death penalty; The New York Times looks at the cost of automating litigation versus its cost savings – better equipment and software equals markedly fewer lawyers; The SCOTUSBlog looks at least week’s Confrontation Clause decision in Michigan v. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 9:24 am
How Not To Spend $120 Million In Hourly Fees On A Single Trial: A Few Questions for Robertson v. [read post]
