Search for: "State v. Quinn"
Results 61 - 80
of 889
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jan 2014, 8:15 pm
Quinn, the Supreme Court case over whether states may properly herd home caregivers reimbursed by government checks into collective representation [syndicated]. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 5:07 pm
By Jim Cline In a decision on a case that had presented significant financial and operational important to Public Employee Unions, the United States Supreme Court held this Monday in Harris v Quinn that the Illinois law, as applied to a special class of home health care workers, unconstitutionally imposed a “fair share” dues payment […]The post In Closely Watched Decision, Supreme Court declines to Hold Mandatory Union Dues Clauses Unconstitutional… [read post]
20 May 2011, 8:34 am
This article begins with the intellectual primogenitor of this approach: Barron v. [read post]
20 Dec 2006, 11:25 am
For publication opinions today (2): In Rita (Threlkel) Quinn v. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 8:34 am
Simply stated, Kappos v. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 8:34 am
Simply stated, Kappos v. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 11:22 am
In Harris v Quinn 573 U.S. ___ (2014) the court held that the First Amendment prohibits a State from forcing non-union members to pay for union speech on matters of public concern. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 11:22 am
In Harris v Quinn 573 U.S. ___ (2014) the court held that the First Amendment prohibits a State from forcing non-union members to pay for union speech on matters of public concern. [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 7:05 am
Chambers v. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 11:17 pm
They have some thoughts on Jones v. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 8:51 am
On December 6, 2011, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Williams v. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 5:46 pm
John Duffy: The Supreme Court Reverses Another Federal Circuit Patent Case Gene Quinn: Industry Reaction To SCOTUS Decision In Sandoz v. [read post]
7 Apr 2009, 6:00 am
Oei v. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 6:21 am
However, the judge rejected this position, stating that the relevant dispute was Quinn's refusal to indemnify Lenihan for potential third party claims in February 2009. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 3:23 pm
Kaplan, Roberta Kaplan, SCOTUS, Stop and Frisk, Supreme Court, United States v. [read post]
29 Jul 2023, 6:57 am
The opinion is styled, Erica Quinn v. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 6:12 am
In Hughes v. [read post]
22 Jun 2022, 4:15 am
The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) on Tuesday announced that it has updated its interim guidance on the Director Review process under Arthrex v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 1:00 pm
In its much anticipated decision in Harris v. [read post]
5 Mar 2019, 10:15 am
In that same vein, following is a discussion of a (less recent) decision from the United States Supreme Court, Elgin v. [read post]
