Search for: "State v. RH" Results 1 - 20 of 58
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Nov 2013, 1:49 am by sally
Regina (Habte) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; Regina (RH (Eritrea) and another) v Same [2013] EWHC 3295 (Admin); [2013] WLR (D) 414 “The procedural requirements to be followed when making a request to another member state pursuant to Council Regulation (EC) No 343/2003 to accept responsibility for processing an asylum claim of a third country national were those set out in the relevant European Union regulations themselves. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 12:57 am by Reproductive Rights
RH Reality Check: 49 Years After Griswold: A Splintering Legacy, This month marks the 49th anniversary of Griswold v. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 4:22 pm by NL
As will become clear, I lean towards the second option… RH v North Tyneside Council v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (HB) [2010] UKUT 462 (AAC) This was a housing benefit appeal, indeed the second HB appeal related to this matter. [read post]
31 Dec 2017, 12:22 pm by Giles Peaker
Nuneaton and Bedworth Borough Council v RH and Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (2017) UKUT 471 (AAC) A very interesting (and perhaps surprising) Upper Tribunal 3 judge decision on the issue of ‘what is a bedroom’ for the purposes of Housing Benefit Reg 13 – the bedroom tax. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 9:00 am by Lovechilde
As we approach the 38th anniversary of Roe v. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 2:28 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Tamiz (Aka Miah) & Ors v R [2010] EWCA Crim 2638 (12 November 2010) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) RH v South London & Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust & Ors [2010] EWCA Civ 1273 (12 November 2010) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) BJM v Nathan Eyre & Ors [2010] EWHC 2856 (QB) (12 November 2010) High Court (Administrative Court) Abbassi & Ors, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home… [read post]
3 Oct 2018, 10:57 am by Linda A. Kerns
  Long ago, a New Jersey court opined on this issue in the case of RH v. [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 7:13 am
See also blogs such as RH Reality Check and the Reproductive Rights Blog. [read post]
9 Oct 2008, 12:37 am
Many states (estimates are as high as 30) will make abortions illegal the minute Roe v. [read post]
22 May 2012, 3:25 pm by Lovechilde
It’s not a coincidence that a movie about the demonic nature of female sexuality drew so much attention in the same year that the Supreme Court, with Roe v. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 8:14 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Aladeselu & Ors v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2013] EWCA Civ 144 (01 March 2013) Aintree University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust v James & Ors [2013] EWCA Civ 65 (01 March 2013) Perry v The Nursing and Midwifery Council [2013] EWCA Civ 145 (28 February 2013) Waterson v Lloyd MP & Anor [2013] EWCA Civ 136 (28 February 2013) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) VFS Financial Services… [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 2:52 am by traceydennis
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty To Animals v Sharp & Ors [2010] EWCA Civ 1474 (21 December 2010) Quila & Ors v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Ors [2010] EWCA Civ 1482 (21 December 2010) Francis, R (on the application of) v West Midlands Probation Board [2010] EWCA Civ 1470 (21 December 2010) Safeway Stores Ltd & Ors v Twigger & Ors [2010] EWCA Civ 1472 (21 December 2010) The Scout Association… [read post]
2 Mar 2007, 2:51 pm
As defined in the Mukherjee application, ETMC is "an electroactive material having a reversible lithium insertion ability, wherein the transition metal is at least one selected from the group consisting of Ti, V, Cr, Mn, Fe, Nb, Mo, Ta, W, Co, Ni, Cu, Y, Zr, Ru, Rh, Pd, Hf, Re, Os, and Ir, and the chalcogenide is at least one selected from the group consisting of O, S, and Se. [read post]
13 Nov 2015, 2:35 pm by Molly Runkle
This afternoon the Court granted review in Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]