Search for: "State v. Ramirez" Results 1 - 20 of 651
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 May 2018, 1:18 pm by Daily Record Staff
Criminal procedure — Illegal sentence — Sentencing right after verdict On June 19, 2017, a jury sitting in the Circuit Court for Worcester County took eight minutes to convict Erick Ramirez, appellant, of second degree rape, second degree sexual offense, third degree sexual offense, fourth degree sexual offense, second degree assault, and filming of child ... [read post]
2 May 2022, 4:45 pm by Lawrence Solum
Ramirez (Loyola University of Chicago School of Law) has posted Race in America 2021: A Time to Embrace Beauharnais v. [read post]
22 Jul 2021, 11:06 am by Barbara S. Mishkin
After reviewing the facts and holding in Ramirez, we discuss how the decision clarifies the concrete harm requirement established by SCOTUS’s Spokeo decision, Ramirez’s implications for class action and individual lawsuits alleging violations of federal consumer financial protection laws, and the potential impact on state court litigation. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 11:26 am by Joel R. Brandes
In Ramirez v Buyauskas, 2012 WL 606746 (E.D.Pa.) the District Court denied the Petition for return of his three children, filed by Francisco Javier Montes Ramirez, a Mexican citizen. [read post]
19 Dec 2012, 7:00 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Here are the materials: DCT Order Denying Motion to Enforce Ramirez Family Motion USA Response Picayune Rancheria Response Ramirez Family Reply   [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 9:40 am
In the end, Moats was released, but a firestorm of controversy ensued, and earlier this week the officer was placed on administrative leave, with no less than the Dallas Police Chief apologizing to Moats and his family and stating that the officer's behavior was inappropriate.Moats, by the way, is a running back for the Houston Texans.Fifteen hundred miles to the West, in Buena Park, California, Joseph Ramirez was sitting in the parking lot of a Rite-Aid taking a brief nap… [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 8:18 am by Michael DelSignore
If the victim does not wish to testify the government will attempt to admit the 911 calls into evidence, pursuant to case law from the United States Supreme Court, that that allows statements made to a 911 operator to come into evidence without the defendant being given the opportunity to cross-examine the victim under a case known as Davis v. [read post]