Search for: "State v. Ramsey"
Results 101 - 120
of 302
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Feb 2017, 9:30 pm
In a recent case, San Francisco v. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 2:55 pm
Ramsey raises a single question on appeal: whether the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress. ... [read post]
17 Jan 2017, 7:52 am
A native of the Upper Peninsula of Michigan, Heikkinen had grown up in the community of Ramsey. [read post]
8 Jan 2017, 4:05 pm
Almost every newspaper, local and national has carried hysterical and inaccurate pieces setting out doomsday scenarios if section 40 is enacted and consistently misdescribing the Leveson system of audited self-regulation as “state backed” (or even “state”) regulation. [read post]
27 Dec 2016, 4:55 am
Briefly: In The New York Times, Adam Liptak looks at Mickelson v. [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 9:30 pm
“Retired Oregon State University professor of history William G. [read post]
9 Oct 2016, 4:07 pm
“Denial“, a film based on Deborah Lipstadt’s book of the 2000 libel trial, Irving v Penguin Books and Lipstadt (see Gray J’s judgment, [2000] EWHC 115 (QB)) has been released in the United States. [read post]
12 Aug 2016, 10:30 am
Ramsey: different remedy, like threats action? [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 5:35 pm
Boundary crossing: sharing research w/community at large v. within the pharma co. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 3:41 pm
[I think this is a matter of leveraging reciprocity norms; Ramsey mentions guilt.] [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 1:47 am
Justice Ramsey ruled against the Council stating that the word “default” meant default in relation to the provisions of the 1984 Act and not the 1957 or 1974 Acts. [read post]
18 May 2016, 11:00 am
For example, in Erwin v. [read post]
18 May 2016, 6:08 am
U.S. v. [read post]
8 May 2016, 11:34 am
(Doyle v. [read post]
8 Apr 2016, 5:09 am
More commentary on Monday’s ruling in Evenwel v. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 10:54 am
Marshall, of course, would become the paradigm-shifting fourth Chief Justice and author of the decision in Marbury v. [read post]
8 Mar 2016, 9:04 am
In the case, Ramsey v. [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 1:00 am
Lord Hodge, with whom Lord Carnwath agreed, provided a dissenting judgment and specifically addressed the issue of retrospective assessment, citing the general principle stated in W T Ramsey Ltd v Inland Revenue Comrs [1981] UKHL 1 that, despite the fact that legislation to counter tax avoidance as a matter of sound policy may involve provisions with retroactive effect, this does not negate the need for clear and positive words as to the retrospective effect of the… [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 7:53 am
State limits choices of individuals to protect them from consequences of their own decisions. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 11:03 am
Lisa Ramsey: Line drawing: who do we ask? [read post]
