Search for: "State v. Rauscher" Results 1 - 8 of 8
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jun 2018, 1:16 am by Jani Ihalainen
Luckily, the CJEU was poised to answer this question in a case that was decided last month.The case of Junek Europ-Vertrieb GmbH v Lohmann & Rauscher International GmbH & Co KG concerned the sale of medical dressings made by Lohmann, sold under the brand "Debrisoft" (TM No. 8852279). [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 1:16 am by Jani Ihalainen
Luckily, the CJEU was poised to answer this question in a case that was decided last month.The case of Junek Europ-Vertrieb GmbH v Lohmann & Rauscher International GmbH & Co KG concerned the sale of medical dressings made by Lohmann, sold under the brand "Debrisoft" (TM No. 8852279). [read post]
28 Aug 2018, 12:16 am by Julius Stobbs
These principles were all recently explored again in the CJEU case of Junek Europ-Vertrieb v Lohmann & Rauscher International Case C-642/16. [read post]
3 May 2016, 3:50 am by Jan von Hein
Infringement of EU law and the duty of using the legal remedies pursuant to Art. 34 N. 1 Reg. 44 / 2001 The Dutch Hoge Raad in Diageo Brands BV v. [read post]
21 Jan 2012, 2:24 am by Giesela Ruehl
The present article analyses the reception of the ECJ cases by courts of the member states. [read post]