Search for: "State v. Redfern"
Results 1 - 20
of 27
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jul 2023, 4:54 pm
The application and reiteration of which was recently seen in Enka v Chubb and Kabab-ji v Kout Food Group. [read post]
4 Feb 2023, 11:35 pm
BCZ[10] and Enka v. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 9:56 am
" (Para 1.55, Redfern, Hunter et al, Redfern & Hunter on International Arbitration, 2015). [read post]
5 May 2019, 9:01 pm
Redfern, of Kayser & Redfern, LLP, of Manhattan, represented the husband. [read post]
10 Sep 2018, 10:11 pm
Ltd. v. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 10:18 am
See Bridges v. [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 4:00 am
" However, the Circuit Court dismissed this contention, explaining that such a claim "is not cognizable in a civil case," citing United States v. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 10:12 pm
See Flag-Redfern Oil Co. v. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 10:12 pm
See Flag-Redfern Oil Co. v. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 8:30 am
” The court thus distinguishes Walker v. [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 7:45 am
Another rule from Fogerty v. [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 7:45 am
Another rule from Fogerty v. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 3:10 am
Michael Reisman, Babel and BITs: Divergence Analysis and Authentication in the Unusual Decision of Kilic v. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 6:39 am
Thanks to Jeffrey Redfern for the pointer. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 2:16 am
Lord Toulson stated that considering the principles of Target Holdings v Redfern, a monetary reward which reflects neither loss caused nor profit gained by the wrongdoer, such as the one argued by the appellant, would be penal. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 10:37 am
-Dallas 2012, pet. denied) (quoting Flag-Redfern Oil v. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 9:44 am
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Unpublished Opinion in the following matter: DA 11-0273, 2011 MT 326N, STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 10:25 am
”While Born argues for “structural limits” (p. 1265) on the power of the law of the seat, Redfern et al seems to content with the state of affairs. [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 11:30 pm
The families argued that Re McKerr had been rendered obsolete by the recent Strasbourg decision of Šilih v Slovenia (2009) 49 E.H.R.R. 37. [read post]
21 May 2011, 8:03 am
This is what even Redfern et al meant. [read post]
