Search for: "State v. Refuge" Results 181 - 200 of 460
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Sep 2016, 11:24 am by Amy Starnes
The latest, and perhaps largest, wound to the information act is a 2015 Texas Supreme Court decision known as Boeing v. [read post]
24 Aug 2016, 3:57 am by INFORRM
The recent CJEU judgment in VKI v Amazon (C-191/15) concerns jurisdiction both in the context of conflict of laws (applicable consumer laws) and the Data Protection Directive. [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 7:59 am by Ruth Levush
(v. 1. of 1727 ed), Library of Congress Prints and Photographs Division, http://www.loc.gov/pictures/item/2003653394/ Who was Dante Alighieri? [read post]
4 Feb 2016, 4:00 am by Administrator
This article critically reviews the Supreme Court of Canada’s recent decision on the application of human rights laws to law firm partners in McCormick v Fasken Martineau DuMoulin LLP in an effort to show how the purposive approach is invoked, how it is then either ignored or applied incorrectly, and how the purposive approach ought to have been deployed if we had remained faithful to its structure and demands. [read post]
30 Jan 2016, 12:41 pm by The Blog Team
” The Third Circuit turned that argument around on the government recently, in United States v. [read post]
30 Jan 2016, 12:41 pm by The Blog Team
” The Third Circuit turned that argument around on the government recently, in United States v. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 4:20 pm by Anthony B. Cavender
A failure to possess appropriate federal authorization can result in acrimonious legal action, and as illustrated in U.S. v. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 8:12 am by Todd Henderson
It is unlikely that Ammon Bundy and friends, currently illegally occupying the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge in Oregon, planned their protest against federal land management policies in the West to coincide with the upcoming Supreme Court argument in Sturgeon v. [read post]
10 Jan 2016, 9:01 pm by Joseph Margulies
Today, for instance, there is broad (though not universal) agreement that same-sex couples should have a right to marry, and that the Supreme Court got it right in Obergefell v. [read post]
19 Nov 2015, 12:00 pm by Ruth Levush
The state compensates the municipality for the additional costs. 4. [read post]
28 Oct 2015, 7:00 am by Ruth Levush
However, in accordance with the case law of the ECHR, the EU Members must not transfer back refugees to the first country of entry, if the conditions in that country violate human rights standards, which amount to degrading treatment (See case of M.S.S. v. [read post]