Search for: "State v. Refuge" Results 81 - 100 of 456
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 May 2011, 9:00 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
ARTICLE V If the person claimed is under prosecution, either in the United States or Haiti, for any other crime than that upon which the demand for extradition is based, the extradition shall be postponed until the judgment is pronounced, and, if the person is convicted, until the sentence imposed is fully served or remitted. [read post]
29 May 2017, 9:43 am by Richard Symmes
How to Manage Old Debt After Recent Supreme Court Ruling It’s easier for old debt to haunt American consumers seeking refuge in bankruptcy, thanks to a recent ruling by the Supreme Court in Midland Funding, LLC v. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 12:26 pm
Baroness Hale states that the phrase ‘would be reasonable for him to continue to occupy’ looks to the future as well as describing a current state. [read post]
26 May 2011, 9:00 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
ARTICLE V Neither of the contracting parties shall be bound to deliver up its own citizens under the stipulations of this convention, but the executive authority of each shall have the power to deliver them up, if, in its discretion, it be deemed proper to do so. [read post]
18 Sep 2009, 2:41 pm
Last week, the United States Supreme Court called a special session and heard oral arguments in Citizens United v. [read post]
4 Sep 2019, 5:41 am by Caroline Shaw
The later chapters take a case-study approach, examining the boundaries between personal reputation and that of groups and of the state. [read post]
14 Jul 2022, 9:01 pm by John R. Vile
The Supreme Court’s recent decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 4:30 am
This could discourage sympathetic groups from lending support to the U.S. military, knowing it would preclude them from seeking refuge in the U.S. in the future.The majority contends that such concerns are overblown, pointing to a provision in the statute allowing the Secretaries of State and Homeland Security, in consultation with each other and the Attorney General, to waive the terrorism bar. [read post]
24 Aug 2016, 3:57 am by INFORRM
The recent CJEU judgment in VKI v Amazon (C-191/15) concerns jurisdiction both in the context of conflict of laws (applicable consumer laws) and the Data Protection Directive. [read post]