Search for: "State v. Register" Results 1 - 20 of 13,591
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jan 2009, 2:33 am
Regina (F) v Secretary of State for Justice Regina (Thompson) v Secretary of State for the Home Department Queen’s Bench “In the absence of any mechanism for review, placing an offender on the sex offenders register indefinitely was a disproportionate interference with the right to respect for private and family life. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 1:45 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Out-of-state employers, insurers, employee benefit plan vendors, and other businesses registered to do business in Pennsylvania, Georgia, Iowa, Kansas, Minnesota, or another state that requires that out-of-state businesses consent to jurisdiction as a condition of their registration to do business in the state face a heightened risk of getting hauled into court in the consent to jurisdiction state following last month’s Supreme Court… [read post]
20 Aug 2009, 2:22 am
Regina (F) v Secretary of State for Justice Court of Appeal “The absence of a right of review at any time of notification requirements imposed upon offenders who had been placed on the sex offenders register indefinitely was a disproportionate interference with the right to respect for private and family life. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 12:15 am
  A foreign corporation that does not transact intrastate business in the state is under no obligation to register with the Secretary of State, but nothing prohibits a foreign corporation from voluntarily registering. [read post]
7 Jan 2024, 2:38 pm by Unreported Opinions
STATE OF MARYLAND appeared first on Maryland Daily Record. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 8:07 am by tracey
Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v Elmi: [2011] EWCA Civ 1403;  [2011] WLR (D)  353 “A person from abroad who had ticked a form at a job centre to confirm she was seeking work and then applied for income support satisfied the requirement in article 7(3)(c) of the Citizens Direction that she was registered as a job seeker and was entitled to income support.” WLR Daily, 18th October 2011 Source: www.iclr.co.uk [read post]