Search for: "State v. Reynolds" Results 61 - 80 of 1,410
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
The law was blocked by a state judge back in 2019 for violating the Iowa Constitution, but Reynolds’ administration is hoping that the recent Dobbs v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 10:28 am by Hugh Tomlinson QC
The source stated that the police officer “could be” the claimant and that he had reported this to the police. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 10:49 am by Matthew Hill
At that time the domestic case law – and in particular the High Court decision in Savage v South Essex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust [2006] EWHC 356 and the Court of Appeal in R (Takoushis) v Inner North London Coroner and Another [2005] EWCA Civ 1440  – stated that the death by his own hand or actions of a person who was not formally detained by the state could not (other than in particular circumstances not applicable in Mr Reynolds… [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 8:05 pm by INFORRM
  In all other respects Flood upheld and applied the principles set out by the House of Lords in Reynolds v The Times and Jameel v Wall Street Journal. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 11:49 am by Jaclyn Belczyk
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website] ruled 7-2 [opinion, PDF] Monday in Reynolds v. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 3:35 pm by Ruthann Robson
Reynolds, United States District Judge James Gritzner for the Southern District of Iowa declared Iowa Code § 717A.3, violated the First Amendment. [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 12:00 pm
SHANMUGAM: No, there was really --there was no difference between the two, and I think really for the reasons that the government states in its brief as well as the reasons that we state in our opening brief, the default understanding has always been that a reference to discovery includes at least constructive discovery. [read post]