Search for: "State v. Richmond"
Results 201 - 220
of 1,479
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Mar 2021, 7:10 pm
One New Jersey appellate court upheld the disqualification of an expert witness who had worked for the State of New Jersey on a case that involved confidential disclosures by the State’s lawyers and its agencies, which disclosures were necessarily involved in the expert witness’s subsequent retention by the State’s adversary in a different case.[10] This decision, like most in this area, turned on a close analysis of the facts and circumstances of the… [read post]
17 Mar 2021, 8:45 am
., LLC v. [read post]
16 Mar 2021, 3:57 am
Court of Appeals in Richmond has vacated a decision rejecting as time-barred false association and false advertising claims by Bayer Consumer Care, AG, against competitor Belmora LLC over use of the mark FLANAX for naproxen sodium pain relieves in the United States. [read post]
3 Mar 2021, 8:55 am
A recent case out of the Western District of Virginia, Marroquin v. [read post]
20 Feb 2021, 1:26 pm
Matal v. [read post]
15 Feb 2021, 8:48 am
In War Eagle, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Feb 2021, 6:00 am
Textualism After Bostock Bostock v. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 8:07 am
In Tingler v. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 6:07 am
Court of Appeals in Richmond has ruled. [read post]
29 Jan 2021, 11:28 am
In Smith Mountain Building Supply, LLC v. [read post]
14 Jan 2021, 12:53 pm
In Bracey v. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 9:05 am
McCullough Richmond: Anitra T. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 12:13 pm
In Bantam Books v. [read post]
8 Jan 2021, 7:00 am
Inc. v. [read post]
7 Jan 2021, 8:27 am
The first of these cases is Appalachian Power Co. v. [read post]
17 Dec 2020, 6:00 am
In Itility LLC v. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 12:20 pm
Rev. 1 (2019): Hailed as a massive victory for the states, the Supreme Court’s 2018 decision in South Dakota v. [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 7:29 am
This is true in most states, including Florida. [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 7:29 am
The Fairfax case, The Barber of Seville, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Dec 2020, 5:06 pm
" It's impossible (I think) to square this with the Supreme Court's recent ruling in Czyzewski v. [read post]
