Search for: "State v. Richmond" Results 121 - 140 of 1,184
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Apr 2019, 6:00 am by Beth Graham
  In her scholarly paper, Professor Hodges proposes instituting a negotiation or bargaining requirement into employment contracts in order to protect employee rights in the wake of the United States Supreme Court’s recent Epic Systems v. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 3:44 am by Edith Roberts
In an op-ed for the Richmond Times-Dispatch, Keisha Russell weighs in on The American Legion v. [read post]
24 Mar 2019, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
Lash, University of Richmond School of Law, has posted The Enumerated Rights Reading of the Privileges or Immunities Clause: A Response to Randy E. [read post]
A second opinion concluded that Y was in a vegetative state and that there was no prospect of improvement. [read post]
14 Mar 2019, 1:00 pm by Paul Caron
Hayes Holderness (Richmond) presents Navigating 21st Century Tax Jurisdiction at Temple today as part of its Faculty Colloquium Series: Hailed as a massive victory for the states, the Supreme Court’s 2018 decision in South Dakota v. [read post]
23 Feb 2019, 12:53 pm
Chiara Giorgetti (Univ. of Richmond - Law) & Natalie Klein (Univ. of New South Wales - Law) have published Resolving Conflicts in the Law: Essays in Honour of Lea Brilmayer (Brill | Nijhoff 2019). [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 6:04 am by Hillary Frommer
For example the Appellate Division has held that the fact that a decedent registered to vote in a particular state does not mean that the decedent made that state his or her domicile (see Laufer v Hauge, 140 AD2d 671 [2d Dept 1988]; Matter of Estate of Gadway, 133 AD2d 83 [3d Dept 1987]). [read post]
13 Feb 2019, 12:03 pm by Christopher G. Hill
  In Travelers Indemnity Co. v Simpson Unlimited, Inc the Court considered the question of what constitutes and “improvement” under this code section. [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
Board of Education and Obergefell v. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 2:16 pm by Iantha Haight
Fogelson (2005) Making Civil Rights Law: Thurgood Marshall and the Supreme Court, 1936-1961 by Mark V. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 6:00 am by Christopher G. Hill
© Construction Law Musings- Richmond, VA is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 license. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 11:09 pm
This was a reference in particular to the infamous front page of the Daily Mail which identified the three judges who decided that the government could not trigger Article 50 (and start the Brexit clock) without the consent of Parliament (R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union [2017] UKSC 5 AKA Miller)Hale noted that Miller is not judge made law by any stretch of imagination. [read post]