Search for: "State v. Richmond" Results 161 - 180 of 1,199
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Feb 2019, 12:03 pm by Christopher G. Hill
  In Travelers Indemnity Co. v Simpson Unlimited, Inc the Court considered the question of what constitutes and “improvement” under this code section. [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
Board of Education and Obergefell v. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 2:16 pm by Iantha Haight
Fogelson (2005) Making Civil Rights Law: Thurgood Marshall and the Supreme Court, 1936-1961 by Mark V. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 6:00 am by Christopher G. Hill
© Construction Law Musings- Richmond, VA is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 license. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 11:09 pm
This was a reference in particular to the infamous front page of the Daily Mail which identified the three judges who decided that the government could not trigger Article 50 (and start the Brexit clock) without the consent of Parliament (R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union [2017] UKSC 5 AKA Miller)Hale noted that Miller is not judge made law by any stretch of imagination. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 5:56 am by Paul Caron
: Hailed as a massive victory for coherence in defining the state tax jurisdiction standard of “substantial nexus,” the 2018 South Dakota v. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 6:00 am by Christopher G. Hill
This type of pitfall was illustrated in the case of InDyne Inc. v. [read post]
31 Dec 2018, 7:00 am by Caroline Lee
Ross was also selected by Dennis Herrera, the San Francisco City Attorney, to handle Litvinova v. [read post]
25 Dec 2018, 10:15 am by Christopher G. Hill
  I am counsel for the plaintiff in the matter of Environmental Staffing Acquisition Corp. v. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 6:00 am by Christopher G. Hill
  When there isn’t mutual assent according to the case of Knox Energy, LLC v. [read post]