Search for: "State v. Richter" Results 1 - 20 of 385
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Aug 2011, 6:42 am by Jacob Katz Cogan
Clemens Richter has published Collapsed States: Perspektiven nach dem Wegfall von Staatlichkeit Zugleich ein Beitrag zu den Grundlagen des Selbstbestimmungsrechts der Völker und zur Struktur des völkerrechtlichen Staatsbegriffs (Nomos 2011). [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 1:28 pm
On January 19, 2011, the Supreme Court announced its decision in Harrington v. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 7:25 am by Michael O'Hear
 Williams is remarkably similar to a Second Circuit case I teach in Criminal Procedure, United States v. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 1:11 pm by Steve Vladeck
But the court in Richter specifically distinguished, rather than overruled, its 1991 decision in Ylst v. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 1:53 pm by Kent Scheidegger
The transcript of the Supreme Court argument in Harrington v. [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 7:41 pm by Mary Pat Dwyer
Richter’s presumption to a state court’s reasoned decision in order to rehabilitate the state court’s unreasonable application of clearly established federal law. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 11:43 am by WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF
By its terms, §2254(d) bars relitigation of a claim “adjudicated on the merits” in state court unless, among other exceptions, the earlier state-court “decision” involved “an unreasonable application” of [...] [read post]
22 Jun 2022, 3:58 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Lee Anav Chung White Kim Ruger & Richter LLP v Capone  2022 NY Slip Op 31731(U) May 25, 2022 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 657197/2020 Judge: Arlene Bluth stands for the proposition that an account stated is stronger than almost any defense. [read post]
23 Jan 2011, 3:58 pm by stu@crimapp.com
On January 19th, 2011, the Court decided Harrington v Richter, Supreme Court NO. 09-587. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 11:10 am
Richter [Cornell LII backgrounder; JURIST report] that the section of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (AEDPA) [28 USC § 2254 text] limiting federal review of state court decisions to decisions resulting from an unreasonable application of the law or an unreasonable determination of the facts is applicable to state court orders issued without an accompanying explanation. [read post]