Search for: "State v. Richter"
Results 81 - 100
of 385
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Sep 2013, 3:47 pm
United States. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 7:11 am
Richter and Johnson v. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 4:00 am
"*** Judges Richter and Kern dissented in part in a memorandum by Judge Richter, concluded that in view of Petitioner's "on-duty theft of money and his subsequent false statements, both of which are offenses involving moral turpitude, the penalty of termination is not so disproportionate to the offense as to shock one's sense of fairness. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 4:00 am
"*** Judges Richter and Kern dissented in part in a memorandum by Judge Richter, concluded that in view of Petitioner's "on-duty theft of money and his subsequent false statements, both of which are offenses involving moral turpitude, the penalty of termination is not so disproportionate to the offense as to shock one's sense of fairness. [read post]
16 Oct 2019, 4:00 am
** Pell v Board of Educ. of Union Free School Dist. [read post]
16 Oct 2019, 4:00 am
** Pell v Board of Educ. of Union Free School Dist. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 11:12 am
In Pottawattamie County v. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 11:41 am
Richter, 09–587 (relisted on 1/15 and, apparently, 1/22). [read post]
19 May 2022, 3:54 pm
In Leather, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 10:36 am
Richter: This is a noncapital habeas murder case involving an ineffective assistance of counsel claim. [read post]
20 Oct 2009, 6:49 am
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. [read post]
3 Jan 2016, 6:19 pm
See Kooner v. [read post]
15 Apr 2018, 8:12 pm
For example, in Richmond Coal Co. v. [read post]
25 Aug 2015, 9:03 am
F.T.C. v. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 3:10 am
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton came to an end Monday on the steps of the nation’s highest court. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 4:47 am
The patent owner did not establish that the Board erred in its finding that the challenged claims were obvious in light of the prior art (Siemens Mobility, Inc. v. [read post]
17 May 2021, 12:45 am
Moreover, Richter stated that all arguments it put forward with regard to the patent as granted applied a fortiori to the auxiliary requests. [read post]
12 Mar 2011, 6:41 pm
In Indiana Harbor Belt Railroad Co. v. [read post]
23 Dec 2020, 6:11 am
Kluwer Trademark Blog reported on the case of Bayer v Richter/Exeltis which seems to change this understanding. [read post]
