Search for: "State v. Roberts" Results 341 - 360 of 17,424
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
  On June 13, Colorado Governor Jared Polis, Colorado Attorney General Phil Weiser, and Colorado Senate Majority Leader Robert Rodriquez issued a public letter announcing a “process to revise” the Act to “minimize unintended consequences associated with its implementation” and consider “delays in the implementation of this law to ensure . . . harmonization” with other state and federal frameworks. [read post]
31 Jul 2024, 5:06 am by Michael C. Dorf
Furthermore, he sets out a long-term agenda.The extreme conservatism of the Roberts Court--overruling Roe v. [read post]
30 Jul 2024, 3:00 am by jonathanturley
Anthony Kennedy’s term would have ended in 2011 rather than 2018, before he wrote opinions such as  United States v. [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 9:05 pm by John M. Golden
For example, Chief Justice Roberts’ opinion for the Court highlighted the following quotation from the Court’s 1856 decision in Murray’s Lessee v. [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 7:51 pm by Josh Blackman
Alito, who had authored the 2022 decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 9:56 am by Josh Blackman
" On top of dangerous and extreme decisions that overturn settled legal precedents — including Roe v. [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 6:06 am by Philip Bobbitt
Justice Robert Jackson’s concurrence in the landmark Supreme Court case of Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 4:30 am by Michael C. Dorf
The dissent was by Justice Kavanaugh, joined by Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Sotomayor and Kagan. [read post]
27 Jul 2024, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
United States, constitutes a warp-speed shift to a new constitutional universe. [read post]
27 Jul 2024, 4:00 am by Josh Blackman
7/27/1929: The Geneva Conventions are signed by United States. [read post]
26 Jul 2024, 11:48 am by Amy Howe
The justices appointed Christopher Michel, a former clerk to Chief Justice John Roberts who has argued 10 cases before the court, to defend the state court’s decision to leave Glossip’s conviction and sentence in place. [read post]