Search for: "State v. Roberts" Results 41 - 60 of 17,358
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Nov 2024, 9:05 pm by Kyle Bradley
Sellers discusses how states and localities have modified their election laws following the Supreme Court’s monumental decision in Shelby County v. [read post]
1 Nov 2024, 6:07 am by Sean Murphy
The merits of this issue were not resolved by the Supreme Court’s 1979 decision in Goldwater v. [read post]
1 Nov 2024, 5:00 am by Bill Marler
 E. coli O157:H7 is one of thousands of serotypes Escherichia coli.[1] The combination of letters and numbers in the name of the E. coli O157:H7 refers to the specific antigens (proteins which provoke an antibody response) found on the body and tail or flagellum[2]respectively and distinguish it from other types of E. coli.[3] Most serotypes of E. coli are harmless and live as normal flora in the intestines of healthy humans and… [read post]
29 Oct 2024, 6:06 am by Albert W. Alschuler
The Supreme Court’s “Presumptive Immunity” Standard An especially baffling aspect of the Supreme Court’s decision in Trump v. [read post]
28 Oct 2024, 5:43 am by Ashley Deeks
Robert Jervis famously conceptualized a “spiral model” of international conflict, in which actions by states that are simply seeking to enhance their own security create a vicious circle of security competition. [read post]
22 Oct 2024, 10:28 pm by Bill Marler
 E. coli O157:H7 is one of thousands of serotypes Escherichia coli.[1] The combination of letters and numbers in the name of the E. coli O157:H7 refers to the specific antigens (proteins which provoke an antibody response) found on the body and tail or flagellum[2]respectively and distinguish it from other types of E. coli.[3] Most serotypes of E. coli are harmless and live as normal flora in the intestines of healthy humans and… [read post]
21 Oct 2024, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
The Supreme Court and other institutions of American government and civil society were largely timid in the face of McCarthyism.With the civil rights movement, progressives embraced free speech, but even then, it was not until 1965, in Lamont v. [read post]