Search for: "State v. Roberts" Results 141 - 160 of 17,448
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Nov 2024, 8:55 pm by Lawrence Solum
The Court’s recent decision in West Virginia v. [read post]
7 Nov 2024, 7:52 am
They preserve the revolution precisely by transposing the revolutionary performance from outside the constitutional state (and thus a threat to it) to become a method, a performance of the revolutionary trajectories now in the service of constitutional stability, or at least solidity. [read post]
Democratic supporters had hoped to see Harris make history as the first Black woman elected president, while Republican voters sought the return of Trump, whose previous term saw significant conservative victories including the overturning of Roe v. [read post]
5 Nov 2024, 7:11 am by fjhinojosa
Williams is quoted in the following article: Terri Langford, As Robert Roberson’s execution neared, Gov. [read post]
4 Nov 2024, 6:39 am by Marty Lederman
In an article here back in July, I explained why Judge Cannon is wrong and why the Supreme Court was correct to hold in United States v. [read post]
2 Nov 2024, 9:05 pm by Kyle Bradley
Sellers discusses how states and localities have modified their election laws following the Supreme Court’s monumental decision in Shelby County v. [read post]
1 Nov 2024, 6:07 am by Sean Murphy
The merits of this issue were not resolved by the Supreme Court’s 1979 decision in Goldwater v. [read post]
1 Nov 2024, 5:00 am by Bill Marler
 E. coli O157:H7 is one of thousands of serotypes Escherichia coli.[1] The combination of letters and numbers in the name of the E. coli O157:H7 refers to the specific antigens (proteins which provoke an antibody response) found on the body and tail or flagellum[2]respectively and distinguish it from other types of E. coli.[3] Most serotypes of E. coli are harmless and live as normal flora in the intestines of healthy humans and… [read post]
29 Oct 2024, 6:06 am by Albert W. Alschuler
The Supreme Court’s “Presumptive Immunity” Standard An especially baffling aspect of the Supreme Court’s decision in Trump v. [read post]