Search for: "State v. Robinson" Results 341 - 360 of 2,163
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Apr 2019, 4:04 am by Edith Roberts
” At Bloomberg Law, Kimberly Robinson reports that during yesterday afternoon’s other argument, in Rehaif v. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 3:54 am by Edith Roberts
At Bloomberg Law, Kimberly Robinson reports that after yesterday’s oral argument in Food Marketing Institute v. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 3:46 am by Edith Roberts
” This blog’s analysis of Tuesday’s argument in North Carolina Dept of Revenue v. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 2:22 am by ASAD KHAN
Parties’ submissions Firstly, Mr Robinson submitted that the line of authority beginning with Onibiyo [1996] EWCA Civ 1338 – which established that it was for the Secretary of State to decide whether further submissions constituted a fresh claim giving rise to a right of appeal – did not survive the Supreme Court’s decision in BA (Nigeria) [2009] UKSC 7. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 3:58 am by Edith Roberts
Woodard, which involves a strip-search of a preschool child by a state caseworker. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 9:30 pm by Mitra Sharafi
Islam v Secretary of State for the Home Department, R v Immigration Appeal Tribunal and Another, ex parte Shah (1999) Nora Honkala72. [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 4:10 am by Edith Roberts
” At Bloomberg Law, Kimberly Robinson reports that after Wednesday’s oral argument in Kisor v. [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 1:44 pm
., dismissed the claim of copyright infringement, stating that even if Pyrrha Design owned the copyright in the designs, Plum & Posey did not infringe it.The main questions raised by the Court in this case are the following:Does copyright subsist in any of the Pyrrha Designs because they are original artistic works? [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 4:12 am by Edith Roberts
This blog’s analysis of Tuesday’s opinion in Washington State Department of Licensing v. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 12:19 pm by Mack Sperling
So why did Business Court Judge Robinson dismiss the UDTPA claim in the antitrust lawsuit (at the Rule 12 stage) in DiCesare v. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 3:52 am by Edith Roberts
Supreme Court takes up Flowers v. [read post]
17 Mar 2019, 5:35 pm by INFORRM
Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 17 October 2018 (Underhill V-P, Sharp LJ and Sir Rupert Jackson). [read post]
13 Mar 2019, 3:13 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The Court considered the principle established in R v Secretary of State for the Home Department Ex p Onibiyo [1996] QB 768, that it was for the Secretary of State to decide whether further submissions constituted a fresh claim giving rise to a right of appeal. [read post]