Search for: "State v. Robinson"
Results 361 - 380
of 2,167
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Mar 2019, 1:44 pm
., dismissed the claim of copyright infringement, stating that even if Pyrrha Design owned the copyright in the designs, Plum & Posey did not infringe it.The main questions raised by the Court in this case are the following:Does copyright subsist in any of the Pyrrha Designs because they are original artistic works? [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 4:12 am
This blog’s analysis of Tuesday’s opinion in Washington State Department of Licensing v. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 12:19 pm
So why did Business Court Judge Robinson dismiss the UDTPA claim in the antitrust lawsuit (at the Rule 12 stage) in DiCesare v. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 3:52 am
Supreme Court takes up Flowers v. [read post]
17 Mar 2019, 5:35 pm
Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 17 October 2018 (Underhill V-P, Sharp LJ and Sir Rupert Jackson). [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 6:54 am
”) State v. [read post]
13 Mar 2019, 3:13 am
The Court considered the principle established in R v Secretary of State for the Home Department Ex p Onibiyo [1996] QB 768, that it was for the Secretary of State to decide whether further submissions constituted a fresh claim giving rise to a right of appeal. [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 2:00 am
Robinson v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 15 Nov 2018. [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 7:17 am
Facts: This case (Robinson v. [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 9:28 am
I’m proud to announce that I am officially opening my book at Marie Robinson this Tuesday NOV 1st! [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 4:10 am
” So writes Justice Jaffe in Picarella v Liddle & Robinson L.L.P. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 1:00 am
Robinson v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 15 Nov 2018. [read post]
2 Mar 2019, 5:42 am
Logistic Regression: A state-of-the-art supervised learning algorithm for machine learning that estimates the probability that a document is relevant, based on the features that it contai [read post]
1 Mar 2019, 11:00 am
” But, years after the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Brown v. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 1:00 am
Robinson v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 15 Nov 2018. [read post]
22 Feb 2019, 4:03 am
At Bloomberg Law, Jordan Rubin and Kimberly Robinson report that in separate concurrences, Justices Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch supported “incorporating the Eighth Amendment’s excessive fines clause to the states by way of the privileges or immunities clause instead of via the Fourteenth Amendment’s due process clause,” “a view of the Constitution that could be incredibly consequential were it to eventually find favor with a majority of justices. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 10:32 am
Co. v. [read post]
18 Feb 2019, 6:59 am
Grossman and Gordon V. [read post]
18 Feb 2019, 1:00 am
Robinson v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 15 Nov 2018. [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 1:00 am
Robinson v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 15 Nov 2018. [read post]
